City mulls action on sign site
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
By Kipp Hanley
Published: May 1, 2008
The inaction of a local property owner to take care of zoning and building issues could lead to legal action by the city of Manassas.
City attorney Robert Bendall stated during Monday's city council meeting that the city plans to send one more letter to 9500 Liberty St. co-owner Gaudencio Fernandez, warning him to address trash problems and to apply for a building permit. The deadline for addressing those issues will likely be seven to 14 days, Bendall said.
That letter is currently being reviewed by the attorney's office, said city building official Brian Smith.
Several months ago, modifications were made to stabilize what's left of Fernandez's former home, on which several controversial signs have been placed. This action by the owner requires a building permit, according to city code. Fernandez has been promising to apply for the permit since January, said community development director Elizabeth Via.
In January, Fernandez came to council with a design for a commercial space on what is currently a residentially-zoned area. Last month, Fernandez stated publicly that he was planning to apply for a special use permit so he could eventually construct a larger sign that would serve as a community gathering place. However, he has yet to do so as of Wednesday, said zoning administrator Lorene Payne.
Via said Fernandez must address the zoning and building issues before a special use permit is awarded for this purpose. A public hearing would also be necessary before the issuance of a special use permit.
Residents of the neighborhood have publicly expressed opposition to any change in zoning to the property.
Staff writer Kipp Hanley can be reached at 703-369-5738 or .
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Reader Reactions
Posted by ( Anny ) on May 05, 2008 at 5:27 pm
“A public hearing would also be necessary before the issuance of a special use permit.“ Who will be folly enough to agree to this???
Chris, bulldozers are a good idea. I’ll bring the camera and champagne to commemorate the moment!
“¡No, no señor! ¡Por favor, no toque mi cartelera!“
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on May 05, 2008 at 5:03 pm
Wow he can’t even follow the law, that’s no surprise. Bulldozers at the ready. Chris Cummings
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Anny ) on May 03, 2008 at 7:12 pm
Gaudencio Fernandez has a FENCE around his property… oh the irony! He should harbour all the illegals in the area that need a sanctuary from the Resolution. “¡Sí señor, tengo mucho espacio aquí!“
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( patrick1234 ) on May 02, 2008 at 8:42 pm
this is america…..freedom of speech !!!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Go Away ) on May 02, 2008 at 12:47 pm
They just make themselves look dumber with the language that they use on their sign. Here’s an idea. Go ahead let them all gather at the house for an event. Someone call the police to say there is a NUISANCE. Make sure we have plenty of police to surround the area, check all status to see if they are legal or illegal, then deport them the hell out of here. SOMEONE PLEASE TEAR DOWN THE SIGN
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( kgotthardt ) on May 02, 2008 at 11:12 am
Come on Mr. F. I know it’s irritating, but you don’t want to detract from the significance your sign has had by not following through with what you said you would do. Make us proud!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( WSGFN ) on May 02, 2008 at 10:57 am
back when I was growing up in Manassas, I believe the phrase “PUBLIC NUISANCE” was used. Are we scared to use this term/law in the era of POLITICAL CORRECTNESS?
When one defies the law with total disregard, as this owner is doing…how many flipin’ letters are you going to send? Save your stamp money and take the proper action for the good of the neighborhood and community.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( PWCMom ) on May 02, 2008 at 8:09 am
Although I agree that this man has every right to voice his opinion, we, as citizens, have a right to demand he do it within the parameters of the law. This property is in a RESIDENTIAL area, and the sign is all broken up and busted. In short, it is an eyesore.
If we allow a sign like this one to become a “gathering” place and remain, then what is to stop other homeowners from doing the same? And what will that do to other neighborhoods?
The ordinances need to be enforced, and why haven’t they been already?
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( litehouse08 ) on May 02, 2008 at 7:28 am
It is a residential area. Leave it that way. Besides we don’t need any of his signs up there anyway. It is not a community gathering places. There are plenty of those around. Pay to use one of them like everyone else does. All he is doing is trying to get a point across that no one cares about.
Report Inappropriate Comment