Clinton faces new GOP attacks ahead of her speech

Clinton faces new GOP attacks ahead of her speech

AP

Ruby Gilliam, a delegate from Minerva, Ohio, wears a hat decorated with a sign promoting both Democratic presidential candidate, Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., and Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., at the Democratic National Convention in Denver, Monday, Aug. 25, 2008

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

AP
Published: August 26, 2008

DENVER (AP) _ Republicans on Tuesday pointedly invoked Hillary Rodham Clinton’s past criticism that Barack Obama wasn’t ready to lead as Democrats began two days at their national convention to be dominated by the old Clinton regime.

It came as Democrats disagreed among themselves on whether they have been hard enough so far on GOP rival John McCain.

Clinton, Obama’s former rival for the nomination, was expected to urge her disappointed supporters to line up in unity behind Obama in a prime-time speech Tuesday night. Her husband, former President Clinton, speaks to the convention on Wednesday night.

The day Hillary Clinton was to address the convention, McCain’s latest TV ad played off her primary campaign spot featuring sleeping children and a 3 a.m. phone call portending a crisis. In the new ad Clinton is shown saying: “I know Sen. McCain has a lifetime of experience that he will bring to the White House. And, Sen. Obama has a speech he gave in 2002.”

A narrator adds: “Hillary’s right. John McCain for president.”

Clinton has already denounced such tactics. “I’m Hillary Clinton and I do not approve that message,” she told members of the New York delegation on Monday.

Some Democratic activists, meanwhile, voiced concern that the convention, which began on Monday, had yet to produce a sustained or effective attack against Republican presidential candidate John McCain.

In particular, they cited comments by former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner, who was Tuesday night’s keynote speaker, suggesting that his speech would not be a red-meat attack on McCain but an appeal for bipartisanship.

“There may be parts of the speech that aren’t going to get a lot of applause, but I’ve got to say what I believe will get our country back on the right path,” Warner — who was neutral in the party primaries — told reporters on Monday.

Democratic strategist Paul Begala took issue with Warner’s comments, suggesting that more partisanship, not less, was needed at the party convention.

“This isn’t the Richmond Chamber of Commerce,” Begala said Tuesday.

On Monday, James Carville, who managed Bill Clinton’s successful 1992 campaign, told CNN: “If this party has a message, it’s done a hell of a job hiding it tonight, I promise you that.”

Democratic party chief Howard Dean took issue Tuesday with such remarks by fellow Democrats, as well as criticism that the party isn’t doing enough to bring die-hard Clinton supporters into the fold.

“We don’t need to attack McCain” during the convention’s opening events, Dean told delegates from Ohio, a battleground state. “There will be plenty of time for that.”

It’s more important, he said, “to make sure people know who Barack Obama is, who Joe Biden is.”

“There is not a unity problem,” he added. If anyone doubts that, he said, “wait ‘til you see Hillary Clinton’s speech tonight.”

Meanwhile, McCain is expected to name his running mate in the coming days.

A top surrogate and prospective No. 2, former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney was to be in Denver on Tuesday to assail Democrats on behalf of McCain. It amounted to a final audition of sorts as McCain seeks a strong running mate who can play the attack-dog role against Obama and running mate Joe Biden. Another Republican said to be a serious vice presidential contender, Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, was to be in Denver doing the same on Thursday.

Biden, in his first public remarks since being named Obama’s running mate, told home-state Delaware delegates he “didn’t always comport myself in the way that I wanted to.”

He did not elaborate, but aides said it was mostly a reference to Biden’s reputation for long-windedness and off-the-cuff remarks that sometimes backfired. He ended his 1988 presidential run amid allegations of plagiarism. As he began a 2007 run, he called Obama “articulate” and “clean.” He also drew criticism for saying “you cannot go to a 7-Eleven or a Dunkin’ Donuts unless you have a slight Indian accent.”

Biden, at times emotional, thanked fellow Delaware Democrats for their tolerance as his large family listened.

Clinton once seemed to have the nomination in her grasp and now is being called on to defend and support the person who wrested it from her. She is effectively playing middlewoman Tuesday night — passing a torch from her husband, the 42nd president, to Obama, who wants to succeed him as the next Democratic president.

But not without some Clinton-style political dealmaking and drama.

The Clinton and Obama camps agreed to limit Wednesday’s potentially divisive nominating process for president, allowing some states to cast votes for both Obama and Clinton before ending the roll call in an acclamation for the Illinois senator.

In one scenario, Clinton herself would cut off the voting and urge the unanimous nomination of Obama, according to Democratic officials involved in the negotiations. They discussed the deal on condition of anonymity while final details were being worked out.

But some Clinton delegates said they were not interested in a compromise, raising the prospect of unwelcome floor demonstrations.

“I don’t care what she says,” said Mary Boergers, a Maryland delegate who wants to cast a vote for Clinton.

Gloria Allred, a California celebrity lawyer and pledged Clinton delegate, briefly disrupted a breakfast meeting of the California delegation on Tuesday. Wearing a gag over her mouth, she protested efforts to discourage Clinton supporters from speaking out.

“There is no doubt in anyone’s mind that this is Barack Obama’s convention,” Clinton said on Monday. And yet, she said, some of her delegates “feel an obligation to the people who sent them here” and would vote for her.

As part of the deal, Obama and Clinton activists teamed up and circulated three petitions on the convention floor Monday night — supporting submission of Clinton’s and Obama’s names for president in the roll call and Biden’s for vice president. Each needed 300 signatures.

Clinton said she wouldn’t tell her backers how to vote, but she told them she would cast her own for Obama.

As well as the speeches by Clinton and Warner, the lineup for the second day of the convention features 11 governors and prominent House and Senate leaders.

Former Vice President Al Gore, Virginia Gov. Tim Kaine and Illinois Sen. Dick Durbin are among the speakers lined up for Thursday night’s convention finale.

Obama will accept the nomination before an estimated 75,000 people at the Denver Broncos’ football stadium that night.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on September 01, 2008 at 8:30 pm

Rasmussen takes aggregates of all the polls too as well. They were almost dead accurate in 2000, 2004, and 2006 plus they weight by party affiliation. Currently McCain is leading in Florida, Ohio, and it is a dead heat in Va. Their are a lot of close states though, Pennsylvania, Michigan, Nevada, Colorado, New Hampshire. Its not like 2004 anymore. Its more like a battle of purple states going either way. It will be close, most Presidential elections are. I think it will be closer than 2004. I am undecided and or leaning towards not voting. I fear that both will be raising taxes and both will try amnsety and or be weak on immigration. LOL Chris Cummings

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( jVA ) on August 29, 2008 at 11:01 am

“Pollster.com? Never heard of that one are they new? Are they as reliable as Rasmussen Reports? Which continues to show a dead heat. “

Pollster has been around at least since 2002.  Its not a polling service though.  They just take aggregates from all of the big polls, Rasmussen, Gallup, etc;

I still think you’re missing the point.  If Rasmussen or any other poll shows a dead heat nationally, so what?  The important polls are the state by state polls.  Who is winning Florida?  Who is up in Ohio?

If the national popular vote meant anything, Al Gore would have won in 2000.  Bush didn’t win the popular vote.  He won the electoral votes.  That’s what’s important, right?

You may be right though.  Might still be a close election.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on August 28, 2008 at 8:05 pm

As i have said previously in many comments i am not voting in this election because both are weak on illegal immigration and both will hike taxes on all as well as the top 1%. Pollster.com? Never heard of that one are they new? Are they as reliable as Rasmussen Reports? Which continues to show a dead heat. By the way most polls also have Michigan and Pennsylvania as tossups too. Which ones are partisan polls? Which ones use likely or just registered voters to tabulate their results? Nobody is running away with this one. I predict another nail biter for whom it may concern. LOL Chris Cummings

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( jVA ) on August 28, 2008 at 12:59 pm

Chris, I don’t know about 20-30%, that seems pretty dubiuos to me.  But yeah I’m sure a portion of HRC supporters will choose not to vote in November.

I don’t know how much polling matters yet, but I think you’re pretty wildly off base on how close the election is.  The National Gallup poll may have them tied up, but we don’t elect our President by who gets the most vote, do we? 

We elect by who gets the most electoral votes.  McCain still has a lot of work to do to catch up if you look at the poll that really matters:

http://www.pollster.com/

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on August 27, 2008 at 9:14 pm

JVA as well let it be noted i am no John McCain fan. As for polling it shows a dead heat between schmuck no.1 and schmuck no.2 but when leaners are added McCain has a slight edge. Both will raise taxes and both will do an awful job on illegal immigration. Trust me, at least 20-30% of Hillary supporters will either choose not to vote or hold their noses and vote for John McCain according to recent polling. I hope she runs again and wins the primary in 2012 so i can definitively vote against her. She is a snake. LOL Chris Cummings

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( jVA ) on August 27, 2008 at 8:40 am

My wife, mother-in-law, and I all voted for Clinton in the primaries.  We’ll be voting for Obama in November.  End of story.  HRC gave a great speech last night.

Chris, you seem like a smart enough guy.  Probably smart enough to know that there is no way on earth 30% of Clinton backers will vote for McCain.  I’d be hoping that’s not what McCain is counting on.

I’m really looking forward to McCain trotting out Cheney and Bush to speak at his convention next week.  What?  No hug?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on August 26, 2008 at 6:06 pm

I wonder where my previous post went. Clinton never wanted unity with Obama. 20-30% of her backers are now planning on voting for McCain anyway even with her speech Tuesday night. LOL Chris Cummings

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on August 26, 2008 at 1:46 pm

Tim Kaine’s speech should be a laugh a minute especially if he talks about the economy, state budgets, and transportation budgets. Worst Governor in recent memory in Virginia. Lets say 20-30% of Clinton supporters vote for McCain or don’t vote at all does that make for a close race or a blowout win?  LOL Chris Cummings

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( jVA ) on August 26, 2008 at 1:20 pm

Please please please please let McCain pick Romney for VP.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement