Complaints ignite zoning appeals

Complaints ignite zoning appeals

Jason Hornick/News & Messenger

The awning of the Fast Fuels service station on Old Bridge Road, near the Va. 123 intersection, is under scrutiny from county authorities because of the color choice.

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Cheryl Chumley

Published: July 7, 2008

Mr. Fast Fuels Owner: Tear down this sign.

That's the underlying message of Prince William zoning staff to the owner of a redeveloped food and gas mart on Old Bridge Road in Woodbridge, who allegedly ignored county code by opting for a red, white and yellow striped sign.

Citizens complained.

"Residents of the area brought their concern about the colors incorporated into the canopy and fascia signs to the attention of the zoning administrator," background paperwork for the Board of Supervisors reads. "The prevailing question was whether or not the color scheme applied to the canopy and fascia was permitted."

Fascia signs are those that are fixed on the outside of a business, usually above the display window. Subway sandwich shops, for example, display a fascia sign above the store's entryway.

In response to community concerns, the zoning administrator reviewed the special permit use that was granted to the Fast Fuels owner and found the store's "canopy and fascia signs were in violation of (code) and the signs would have to be brought into conformance," according to board agenda documents.

Conformance, the administrator said, called for removal of the "multicolor striping around the fascia of the quick food store and the canopy, while retaining the approved the text and flag logo on each of those structures," agenda documents continue.

So the colors go; the logos stay.

The owner, in turn, appealed. Supervisors will decide the outcome today, but staff has issued an analysis of support for the zoning administrator's decision.

"The special use permit requires the canopy and fascia to be white in color, and the canopy has remained white through the several owners that have occupied the property," documents to the board read.

A telephone call for comment placed to the sign applicant listed on the board's documents was not returned. But Nick Evers, the county's zoning administrator, said the special use permit has always made clear the terms of the signage and the county was now just "carrying [the requirement] through."

Supervisors are due to hear the appeal sometime after 2 p.m. today at the McCoart Building.

Staff writer Cheryl Chumley can be reached at 703-670-1907.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( DuaneNoVA ) on July 09, 2008 at 8:22 am

The county “made a mistake” in approving the signage. The county should pay for the replacement of signs. The gas station followed the rules and had an approved permit. It should not be punished and have to pay for new signs.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( BeingHumble ) on July 08, 2008 at 2:34 pm

I like these colors !!
Please just leave the owner alone… 

“The County” should focus on more important things than complain about the color Sigh…

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( 99escott ) on July 08, 2008 at 1:15 pm

The county needs to worry about how to put the funds back into the Senior Center and trying to keep taxes from going through the roof.

What a waste of taxpayers money.  Get over it and concentrate on things that are more important!!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Deo ) on July 08, 2008 at 12:50 pm

So stupid!!!  What’s wrong with the county going the L.V. look?!!!  Go to Manassas which is in PW and they don’t have problems with it.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( ejben ) on July 08, 2008 at 11:55 am

The subject is: what the Special Use Permit allows. This is not allowed thus a LAW is broken.Lets get real here ,first it’s one Law, then another till we are a County of mish-mash.And full of illegal SIGNS. Gee does this sound like the Illegal Aliens.
They will go out of business, so they may as well go now if they can’t follow the Rules.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( syligirl1 ) on July 08, 2008 at 11:49 am

I am surprised that another gas station has replaced the old one- that is the worst intersection in our area, I will say that the color scheme is somewhat loud but I am not sure that it is something that I would have complained about- but then again it is at the entrance to “Lake Ridge” and people will complain- did they just recently open?  How is it that they can pass final inspection - if they are in violation – and why did the owner not have knowledge of this ahead of time?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Go Away ) on July 08, 2008 at 10:59 am

If that is such an issue, the come to Manassas, and talk to the City Council there about taking down that Damn sign in Manassas.  TALK ABOUT AN EYE SORE…..  Many of us have complained about it but notice it’s still up.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( vancampenhout ) on July 08, 2008 at 9:44 am

Why doesn’t the county and the uppity residents use their energy and focus on the eyesore(s) of Route 1 cooridoor from the river to Optiz.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( MISSGEE ) on July 08, 2008 at 8:38 am

Yes this is silly i agree people dont have nothing to do but argue about stupid things I agree it looks fresh and clean WHO CARES ABOUT THE COLORS!!!!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement