M. Park schools face budget cuts

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Kipp Hanley

Published: March 11, 2008

Manassas Park City Schools are paying a heavy toll for a decline in real estate assessments and a drop in school enrollment.

Manassas Park Superintendent Thomas DeBolt proposed his 2009 budget Monday night to the School Board and it was full of red ink. Thirty-six and a half positions — including 15 support staff —would be eliminated for the 2008-2009 school year. That’s nearly 9 1/2 percent of the district’s 383 employees.

This is on top of a host of mid-year 2008 budget adjustments that saw the freezing of 11 vacant positions in the school system, a significant reduction in after-school programs and a deferral of maintenance and repairs. 

These adjustments and other measures helped offset the 2008 budget shortfall of $1.9 million. 

That shortfall stemmed from a near 9 percent drop in assessments and a decline in enrollment, which resulted in a decrease in state funds.
“The city has a problem too, it’s not just the schools,” DeBolt said. “We did everything we could to close the gap.”
On March 25, the School Board will hold a public hearing on the proposed budget and then on March 31, will vote on it.

The school system balanced its 2008 budget by eliminating $400,000 in programs and positions and saving $470,000 from the 2007 budget. The school system also hopes to get an additional $545,000 through the 10-cent real estate tax proposed by the city council. 

The current tax rate is $1.14 per $100 of assessed value. City finance director Gary Fields said the city will likely advertise a $1.27 tax rate as opposed to $1.24, though, to allow for some wiggle room.
To meet DeBolt’s 2009 budget of nearly $35.3 million, the schools will have to use more than $618,000 of its restricted fund balance, which is typically used as a rainy-day capital improvement fund for projects like building schools.

DeBolt said this was necessary or else the school system would’ve had to make even more significant personnel cuts in this year’s proposed budget. 

DeBolt said that normal attrition might allow the city to retain as many as 12 or 13 of the 21.5 teaching positions. But the city will likely lose all but three of the 15 support staff slated to be axed.
While he didn’t criticize the council for its recommendation to raise the tax rate by only 10 cents, DeBolt said that the School Board did an effective job in relaying to the council just what that increase would do to the school system. 

According to the superintendent’s budget, an 18-cent tax rate increase was necessary in order to maintain the status quo for the 2008-2009 school year.
“It’s not pretty, but that’s what the governing body asked us to do,” DeBolt said. “We told them this [tax rate] was going to involve a significant reduction in the workforce.”
DeBolt said that the mass exodus of Hispanic children —  he estimated around 100 — was partly to blame for the decline in enrollment. DeBolt cited adjustable rate mortgages, a loss of construction jobs and the Prince William County resolution restricting services to illegal immigrants as reason for the enrollment plunge.

Overall, the school’s numbers are expected to drop from 2,516 students on Sept. 30, 2007, to 2,400 this Sept. 30.

However, with the Park Center project coming on line soon, which could add up to nearly 300 residential units, the school’s enrollment could be in good shape in a few years, said DeBolt. Until then, there is a strong possibility that class sizes will increase slightly and specialized services like English as a Second Language will be limited.
“The American economy is resilient, it will come back,” DeBolt said. “We want to remain a strong school system serving whatever students we have.”

Staff writer Kipp Hanley can be reached at 703-369-5738 or at .

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on March 12, 2008 at 9:58 pm

Furthermore have you seen how trashy the illegals neighborhood on Prince William Street looks? I drove through there a few weeks ago and this was around 2-3pm in the afternoon. Their was trash and junk in front and side yards as well as graffiti on buildings. They need to clean that place up and out. Chris Cummings

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on March 12, 2008 at 9:54 pm

Local severity? Things were tough before the Resolution was passed in October 2007 and especially before the Resolution was enforced starting Mar 3. 2008. Actually the local economy is doing fine in respect to jobs. There are more now because illegals have left. Now we need to keep them out. What works in Arizona and Georgia can work in Virginia too. Don’t give up USA keep the fight for equality and fairness for all legal immigrants. Chris Cummings

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( MPMom ) on March 12, 2008 at 4:07 pm

I would agree hldl.  If the schools are RIF’ing, the City should share the pain and make cuts there as well.  Maybe even adjust the revenue sharing agreement. 

I would welcome $1.30 tax rate if it keeps programs in places even with some personnel cuts.  I have one child in Cougar and another there in a year.  It matters to me that my children able to be educated in my public schools system. Cut too much my house will join the others on the block for sale and we’ll move to Fairfax.  If you want good homeowners, you need good schools.

By the way, could we do a little more development of the business and commercial tax base here in the Park so the burden isn’t solely that of the homeowner?  I love Manassas Park and I want to see it thrive, not struggle in the shadow of its neighbors.  There is so much good going on here, especially in the schools.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( richie ) on March 12, 2008 at 2:13 pm

Agreed that raising the tax rate to $1.27 would still result in a net reduction in taxes paid.  With that said, it’s documented that MP has one of the highest tax rates in the state. 
Let’s not give credence to the gross misconception that adjustable rate mortgages are a big culprit either.  ARMs have been used by responsible homeowners for many years.  It’s “liar loans” where borrowers overstated income, investors, illegal immigrants who set up boarding houses and those who obtained teaser ARMS based on MTA and other indexes that are fueling the housing decline.  You can’t just say it’s ARMs and leave it at that.  In the end we need to do what is right for the kids and do it in a fiscally responsible manner.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( hldl ) on March 12, 2008 at 10:31 am

I took a look at what my home has been assessed for this year. If the City raises the taxes to $1.27 it appears I would be paying less on my taxes. My biggest concern is the schools. To me education is very important. I don’t see how the city can allow the remaining children in Manassas Park suffer by losing educators or programs. I have one question. How many employees is the City letting go to help the shortfall? If there are none then it makes me wonder if they really care about our kids and their education.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( litehouse08 ) on March 12, 2008 at 8:38 am

Well, who did not know this was going to happen. It was only a matter of time. They got greedy and now the survivors have to pay. Chalk another one up for Manassas Park. They are the greediest city government around. Now with the new tax hike how will the rest of us keep our houses?? You know, the ones that have lived here forever. They think it’s bad now, wait till the rest of us have to walk away. Has anyone really looked around MP?? It is truly hideous. Empty houses with trashy yards. Check out where the city government officials live. See what kind of houses they have. Do you think they are going to suffer. Of course not. Part of that rise in taxes is filling their pockets so they don’t have to change their lifestyles. Why not cut their pay? But it’s all about screwing the little guy. If i could move tomrrow i would not hesitate.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( phdee ) on March 11, 2008 at 7:29 pm

Actually, it is the resolution, HSM, Letiecq, et al who are primarily to blame. Yes, the economy is in a downturn but the l.ocal severity has been exaggerated by the anti-immigration crowd and actions.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on March 11, 2008 at 7:16 pm

That was the ide of the Resolution to force illegals to go. Thanks for leaving, don’t let the door hit you on the way out, now i wish they would fine heavily the illegals employers. Chris Cummings

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement