Man guilty of assault on lawyer

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By KIPP HANLEY, Potomac News & Manassas Journal Messenger
Published: April 30, 2008

David Allen Hagelin was found guilty of assault and battery Tuesday and will be sentenced this morning at Prince William County Circuit Court.

Hagelin, 45, of Woodbridge, was charged with attempted capital murder for attacking his former attorney, Jennifer Zary, at the Prince William-Manassas Adult Detention Center on Nov. 6. When the incident occurred, Hagelin was in jail awaiting trial on rape, forcible sodomy, object penetration, aggravated malicious wounding and abduction with intent to defile charges from an Aug. 1 incident outside of Manassas Park.

Hagelin pleaded guilty to those charges in March and will be sentenced on May 22.

In his closing argument Tuesday, Hagelin's attorney, Robert A. Harris, pleaded with the jury to focus on the issue of premeditation. In order to be found guilty of attempted capital murder, among other things, the defendant has to have committed a willful, deliberate and premeditated act.

Harris believed his client's actions met the first two criteria but not the third.

"I think it was fair, I just didn't think that he planned to do that," Harris said. "He lost control and he acted on that."

Zary said she was shocked with the decision by the jury and believed had several guards at the prison not come to her aid within seconds of the attack, she likely would have died.

"They [the jury] didn't get to hear about the rape, sodomy, forcible penetration and malicious wound-ing charges against him," Zary said. "What he did to me was violent and this decision just feels inade-quate."

On Nov. 6, Hagelin was led down to one of three interview rooms set aside for prisoners and their legal representa-tives to meet with Zary. During her testimony, Zary said after an hour of meeting, the conversation became heated.

Zary said that when she told Hagelin they were done meeting, Hagelin stood up and said "we're not done." Zary said she yelled to try to get the attention of prison therapist Eleanor Heath, who was next door counseling another prisoner in one of the three soundproof booths.

That's when Hagelin said he was going to kill her, Zary said.

According to Zary's testimony, he then knocked her down and began to choke her and knock her head against the floor.

Officer Eric L. Waddington testified that he was doing his rounds outside the room and happened to see the expres-sion on her face through the window before the attack and said "she just looked alarmed." As he was reaching for his keys, Waddington said he saw Hagelin knock Zary over.

He exclaimed "Holy shit," which got the attention of others nearby.

Ultimately, three other officers testified that they helped Waddington subdue Hagelin before a fourth officer helped pull Zary out of the fray. Zary was led into the adjacent booth where Heath comforted the sobbing, shaking 32-year-old attorney.

During his testimony, Hagelin claimed he just lost his cool and was trying to prevent her from leaving. However, five witnesses testified that Hagelin resisted their attempts to free Zary from Hagelin's grip.

Pictures submitted as evidence showed Zary with a flushed face and a cut on her elbow. She also testified that she received several bruises on the back of her head from being slammed to the floor and that some of her hair was pulled out during the incident.

Zary said the lack of serious injury and the potential that the jury didn't understand the full meaning of pre-meditated might have hurt her case. The definition of premeditation in legal terms states that it doesn't take any certain length of time for an individual to commit a "premeditated act."

"It's something lawyers struggle with defining, and this is a jury with no special training," Zary said.

Zary said the attack last November has made her nervous each time she has stepped back into one of those meeting rooms. However, she said she won't stop meeting with her clients face-to-face because she feels like she needs to build trust with them.

Zary said she has had clients get angry with her in the past and the way she deals with that is the same way she tried to deal with Hagelin on Nov. 6.

"The way I control the situation is I leave," Zary said.

Staff writer Kipp Hanley can be reached at 703-369-5738.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( rosemary ) on May 05, 2008 at 11:16 am

Adavis- You must one of her friends or something…. She most certainly did not try to best to defend my son, in fact she did nothing.  Never returned calls, and always had attitudes when you did talk to her. Luckily, we were able to get a better attorney and she did not have to represent my son anymore.
Her working for “little money” is her choice.  She doesnt have to do that.  And money shouldnt havent anything to do with it. Everyone is entitled a fair trial, and I just dont think that she can offer that.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( threeexl ) on May 05, 2008 at 9:44 am

If Ms. Zary was really “on her client’s side” then they would be better off defending themselves and she probably would not have been assaulted. And if the little bit she did for my son was her “best effort”, then she should definitely pick another profession. The reason he only got 12 months was probably because it came to light that Ms. Zary DID provoke the attack. They probably cut a deal with the inmate for the 12 months so he wouldn’t say anything public about it.  The fact that she works for little money is irrelevent. She picked this profession. It’s her job to defend her clients to the best of her ability, and she knows the risks. ADavis, until you have a loved one who is ever in trouble and gets Ms. Zary appointed to represent them, then you have no idea what you are talking about.

ADavis, do some research and tell me how many client/lawyer assaults have happened at Manassas jail within the past 10 years. My bet is that this type of thing RARELY happens. Remember, there are two sides to every story.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( adavis ) on May 02, 2008 at 4:35 pm

Assault is not an adequate verdict in this case. Ms. Zary was puposefully attacked and if not seen by a passerby, may well have suufeered irreparable injury ior death at the hands of this felon. To read that “she is not compassionate” is a crock of lies coming from the parents or relatives of criminals that were represented by Ms. Zary - so I think we need not give those comments credence. Ms. Zary works for little money to defend criminals and is very good at what she does.

Be glad she was on your side. What you see in Ms. Zary is not a lack of compassion, it is a concentration on her job - to get your criminal children off the hook! how dare you. What’s wrong, did your criminal kid end up in jail even with her best efforts to defend them?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( threeexl ) on April 30, 2008 at 11:49 am

I for one am not surprised that this happened to Ms. Zary. Although I do not condone what the inmate did I sort of understand why he did it because of my past experiences dealing with her. She shows no compassion when dealing with her clients and their families(My son WAS a client of hers), and she does not know how to talk to people. This should have taught her a lesson on how to deal with inmates who are already in a desperate situation and are looking to her for help. They just want to be talked to like a human being and with at least a minimal amount of respect. The same goes with the families of inmates. Families of inmates don’t want to hear her cascading into a full courtroom, joking and laughing about how her client/their family member’s bond is going to be denied. Judging by her comments in the article though it looks like she has learned nothing. Maybe this is why she is nervous each time she meets with a client. If she would just show the inmates a little bit of compassion and treat them with a little more respect, then she will have nothing to be nervous about.

Also I can’t believe the S-Bomb was dropped in this article!!!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( leahmom ) on April 30, 2008 at 8:40 am

I don’t agree with Mr. Hagelin’s actions but I’m not shock one bit.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( rosemary ) on April 30, 2008 at 8:03 am

I think that it is terrible that this happened to Ms.Zary. BUT I think the outcome was fair.  I realy dont think the inmate had intentions of killing her.  Ms.Zary has always been nervous around inmates. And she shows them no respect when she speaks to them.  The inmate already has several charges on him, and I am certain that she treated him like she didnt care about anything he was saying.  How do I know this?  She was assigned to my son and I personally witnessed her lack of compassion and unprofessional behavior around him and the court house.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement