Supervisors receptive to SPCA idea

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Lillian Kafka

Published: May 14, 2008

Prince William County could be getting an animal advisory committee, but its top elected board official said that doesn’t mean the animal shelter is getting more money.

Fiscal restraints are showing their signs at the animal shelter, where some adoptable pets must be euthanized because the facility is overcrowded; $2.5 million to expand the shelter was shifted to other priorities a few years ago.

On Tuesday, the Prince William Board of County Supervisors expressed interest in forming an animal advisory committee that could provide suggestions on how to lower the euthanasia rate and increase the number of pets who undergo spay or neuter procedures before they are adopted.

Concerns such as these were raised last year by the Prince William chapter of the Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals, which recommends the county create the advisory group.

County staff will return to the board later this year with a recommendation that the board take an official position on the committee.

Board members were hesitant to say they’d funnel money to a new committee.

“I want to make it that clear there will be no significant improvements to the shelter — at least not any improvements that are funded by the county,” said Chairman Corey A. Stewart, R-at large. “We can’t be increasing funds for the shelter at the same time we’re cutting programs for human beings.”

Today, 53 percent of the animals that enter the shelter’s doors are euthanized.

Six percent of those animals are actually adoptable; the rest are wild, sick, injured or euthanized at the request of families, said Sam Newsome, animal control administrator.

Currently, 60 percent of the animals adopted from the shelter are spayed or neutered, Newsome said. The rest are adopted under a contract that the new owners will sterilize the pets, although the shelter does not have enough staff to follow up on those contracts, he said.

“I would very much like to have three more animal control officers and two more caretakers,” Newsome told the board.

He said the caretakers and animal control officers have to make hard decisions at the shelter and they appreciate the support from groups like the PWSPCA.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( Pmccon ) on May 16, 2008 at 8:55 am

Euthanasia is a sugar coated way of disguising executing innocent animanls.  There animals have done nothing to cause there being in the shelter.  Humans are responsible.  Has any one looked at the execution list this week?  Has any of the Board members visited these animals on death row?  Probably not.  If any of their pets were in the list would they be concerned?  I bet they would be.  Committees are political ways of making long term decisions.  An emergency exists now and money needs to be allocated to end the executions.  The political posturing needs to end.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( kgotthardt ) on May 15, 2008 at 1:57 pm

If Corey Stewart gave a damn about human beings, he wouldn’t be making the kinds of rash, expensive decisions he has been just to gain political popularity among a small, vocal group focused on a single issue.  He wouldn’t be selling us out to developers and national lobbyists.  He would have been supporting social services and education (among other things), and then he would have had money to support the shelter as well.  Stewart is guilty of human and animal neglect.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( John B ) on May 15, 2008 at 11:05 am

As the county population increases so will the number of animals that end up in the shelter.  That little shelter was never meant to deal with the demands of todays PWC.  If the county can’t afford to build another one or expand the current one, then I think stricter leash laws and higher fines for owners who violate them are in order.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( bama ) on May 14, 2008 at 11:32 pm

Hopefully, Stewart’s comments here will not be well (nationally) publicized. He has damaged the region’s reputation enough-not so much his messages, but the way he communicates them. He obviously has no internal monologue. He would be THE LAST attorney I would hire for any reason whatsoever. As for the his desired Lt. Gov. slot, dream on ...... By the way does he mean cutting programs for human beings, or cutting tall grass in the neighborhoods to the tune of $2MM this summer?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement