Supporters continue Manassas senior day care fight
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
By Cheryl Chumley
Published: June 2, 2008
Despite the lateness of the fiscal 2009 budget hour — it was passed a month ago — a handful of community members won’t let go of their push for Prince William supervisors to rethink their April 29 vote to cut funding for the Manassas senior day-care center.
In an unsigned e-mail, supporters of the facility ask those with likeminded views to attend today’s 2 p.m. supervisors’ meeting at the McCoart Administration Center and “speak for those unable to speak for themselves” by requesting that the board reinstate the funding.
“[Supervisors] blame ’budget constraints’ [for the cut], yet this program costs the county less than $150,000 a year, and they spend millions on golf courses, a performing arts center, new office buildings, museums, a new 24-hour fitness center exclusively for county employees, millions in incentives to larges corporations, etc,” the unsigned e-mail reads.
In a tight budget season such as the county just faced, however, the chances of board members re-funding the center are slim — and for good reason, said Supervisor John Jenkins, D-Neabsco.
“No, ma’am,” he said, in answer to whether he would support such a budget amendment. “This facility was … operating in the red. We had tried to rescue them a year before by giving them advice … and it was draining resources from the rest of the [Area Agency on Aging] program.“
Courtney Tierney, director of the agency, was in a meeting and unable to return a telephone call seeking specifics about the program’s costs and the number of seniors who were served. But figures from her office provided by the county’s communications director show supervisors saved $233,169 this year by closing the center — a figure, to Jenkins, that’s ” a big subsidy” and unwarranted, given the service options available. That amount paid for service to 26, though not all attended daily or full-time, said Liz Bahrns, communications director.
“The reason I don’t think it needs to be subsidized is there are better services in the private sector,” Jenkins said. “Why pay a quarter of a million dollars as an incentive to use government services when you can get the same services for cheaper somewhere else?”
Similarly, Supervisor Michael May, R-Occoquan, expressed no personal drive to overturn the board’s decision of a month ago.
“This was a very difficult decision,” he said, adding the budget cut came on the heels of a recommendation from the county executive, made even months earlier. “When you have a decision, you should stick with it.”
Supervisor Wally Covington, R-Brentsville, meanwhile, said he could support a return of funding to the center if “someone were willing to cut something else.” But without this offset, he didn’t see an overturn of the board’s earlier budget decision as feasible.
“The money tree hasn’t grown any extra,” Covington said, adding the closing did not come absent a bit of personal rue.
The Manassas site is scheduled to shut its doors June 20, yet the county-operated Woodbridge senior facility will remain open.
“The closing creates another disparity between east and west funding,” Covington said. “And that’s always been bothersome to me. There are so many disparities all the time.”
Those now served by the Manassas center will have to look for options in the private market, like Hearth and Home, a “very similar” facility that “in some ways, is even superior,” said Chairman Corey Stewart, R-at-large.
“It has longer hours, the costs are very similar, there’s an RN [registered nurse] on duty,” he said. “The board, of course, doesn’t want to cut anything but we had to, and this program is one we reluctantly cut … It had very high overhead costs and it just made a lot of sense to shut down.”
The April vote to close the Manassas center was unanimous. Covington said he and fellow supervisor, Frank Principi, D-Woodbridge, initially supported a budget scenario that allowed for the center’s continued funding. But fiscal realities and the need to find savings eventually brought about the 8-0 decision to close.
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
(Requires free registration)
- Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
- Respect others.
- Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
- See the Terms and Conditions for details.
Click here to post a comment.

Reader Reactions
Posted by ( MikeHodge ) on June 04, 2008 at 10:12 am
Its fair to say that many seniors have invested into the Prince William budget for a very long time. Certainly we can find $150,000 to keep the center viable?
This issue isnt just about money...its about our values...our priorities.
They have taken care of us, now lets take care of them as long as we are fortunate to have them!
Mike Hodge
Montclair
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( kgotthardt ) on June 04, 2008 at 7:03 am
Corey Stewart wouldn’t know a “superior” elder facility from a substandard one. He’s got gall to say this when the folks at MSDC have Alzheimer’s patients who require structure and a familiar environment to keep them stabilized. I’m tired of this county handing its responsibilities off to other people because they want to spend OUR money on their own pet programs.
The BOCS has grossly mismanaged our tax dollars, doesn’t care about our vulnerable populations, and obviously has no concern for the welfare of the elderly, the physically and mentally disabled, or their families. They’d rather save a pittance than put their political agendas aside.
YES, I’m angry about this. Some of the best people I have known and love, and some I’ve worked with in the past, are in the 70+ age group. How dare the BOCS disrespect their seniors like this!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( 01Bobnot ) on June 03, 2008 at 7:48 pm
With such a large amount of our population approaching retirement and old age the powers that be better get their arrogant heads out of their rears and start addressing the issue! In fact it’s something that should have been dealt with long ago. I’m in my forties and just recently was thrust into the position of having to take care of a elderly family member and it has, and is, anything but smooth and simple. To put it more accurately it’s been an on going nightmare.The nursing home, elderly care situation is pretty bad and it is something that should be a top priority for everyone. Unless a person passes away prematurely we can all look forward to old age. The amount of money or status a person has shouldn’t decide how well a person is treated when they get old but in our greed driven society it means everything. In a truly great country it wouldn’t. If a person does make it to old age more than likely they’ve been through quite a lot, their final years shouldn’t be as miserable as far too many peoples are. It’s amazing to hear so many people blatantly preaching about how religious they are when about the only thing they truly worship is the (not so mighty anymore) dollar bill. Unfortunately not many people handle power very well, the my way or the highway types. Very little compassion or concern for anyone or anything except their own benefit. Sadly way too many of our politicians on all levels exhibit that mentality. If any part of the email mentioned above is true,
““[Supervisors] blame ’budget constraints’ [for the cut], yet this program costs the county less than $150,000 a year, and they spend millions on golf courses, a performing arts center, new office buildings, museums, a new 24-hour fitness center exclusively for county employees, millions in incentives to larges corporations, etc,” the unsigned e-mail reads.”
,they should be ashamed! There shouldn’t be any tax money spent on any of those items, especially in a time of tight budgets! Why in the hell is the county (if they are) spending any money on golf courses? Those are private owned establishments and if they’re not they should be. And county employees can join a gym just like anyone else who desires. Supervisor Jenkins must have some tie to a nursing facility or care facility of some sort or have his head fully in the clouds. Is he aware of the raping of the US tax payer private industry has done and is doing in regards to the farce of a war we’re currently stuck in in Iraq? Elderly care is no different, if a person is fortunate enough to have some money or value you can be sure there are people eyeing to take all they can. If a person doesn’t, like way too many, the outlook is pretty bleak.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( cathy ) on June 03, 2008 at 10:26 am
The comment made by Supervisor Jenkins that the MSDP was “operating in the red” is somewhat misleading. All county programs operate “in the red.” If they did not, there would be no need to collect taxes.
The large budget figure cited by the County may not be accurate because in years past, for example in FY07, the Country “transfer in” was $243,857, but the revenue was around $95,000 so the cost to the county was around $180,000 and about $40,000 of that amount is contributed by Manassas and Manassas Park.
If I put my dad in a Veterans home or if Medicaid clients went into nursing homes instead of using the Senior Day Program, this would cost taxpayers much, much more. I believe adult day programs are the answer to the hundreds of billions of tax dollars spent on federally subsidized nursing homes, while allowing families to stay together and provide much better care.
The private sector option is not adequate for many families for a variety of reasons.
Report Inappropriate Comment