Preserving a respite from the chaos

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

OUR OPINION
Published: August 19, 2008

The Manassas National Battlefield Park is an oasis in the desert of development that is Northern Virginia.

Inside its grounds one can almost imagine what life was like before cars, malls and commerce became the dominant features in the landscape of life.

Efforts to preserve the historic nature of the battlefield have gone on for years — some good, some misguided. The National Park Service cut down more than 140 acres of rare oak trees at the battlefield
to preserve the view of a Civil War battle. We thought that was a ridiculous move.

Preserving the battlefield land as a monument and an educational tool is a boon to the 21st century public. It gives us a place to imagine and learn about the Civil War, but we don’t have to tear down
nature to preserve it.

But what’s done is done.

Other preservation efforts make more sense to us. The park and Prince William County planning departments are trying to find ways to protect the views on the battlefield. As development in the area
surrounding it grows, there is more chance of an impact to the battlefield. So, the planning departments will do a study to attempt to guide development outside the park, and hopefully limit road
construction and the height of office parks, apartment buildings and billboards.

The whole point of the battlefield is to give people a park, an escape from the hubbub of ordinary life, a return to nature and a tool to remember the past. If the outside world grows so big that it begins to
invade the view of the park, then the purpose of the battlefield will be diluted.

As much as possible, we think the peace and integrity of the park should be preserved. Developers will always be seeking a way to expand and grow; it is the juggernaut of capitalism. But, our leaders
must find a way to stop this force when necessary, and in the case of the Manassas National Battlefield Park, it is essential.

We hope county and park officials can find a way to keep the battlefield as it is, so that our children may have the opportunity to gather the peace of stillness and contemplation that comes from it.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( Native63 ) on September 03, 2008 at 9:49 am

In the ‘60’s I recall picnics, kites and minature planes, Dad pointing out the beavers and birds while we walked together in the battlefield. Personally I believe we should turn our view to who actually would have benefited by the razing of our shady places and creature comforts, why not keep up the educational practice of placing a marker on-site with depicting it’s historical appearance?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( phdee ) on August 21, 2008 at 10:38 am

My feeling is that most trees should have remained.  How do those bureaucrats making the decision to harvest the timber know how the battlefield looked back then?  They don’t.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Irishlad ) on August 20, 2008 at 7:52 am

The Battlefield has been here much longer then many other local land marks and is what put our area on the map.  The tax and tourist dollars generated from people visiting the Battlefield is not kept in a vacum, but rather we all benefit from the tourists who visit the Battlefield. 

Businesses come and go, but our National history is with us forever, unless of course we allow those with no sense of history or vision have their way.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement