A brokered convention for Democrats

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

Ken Concannon
Published: April 25, 2008

My mother-in-law, a lifelong Democrat, has been singing the praises of John McCain lately. Although she has never voted for anyone but a Democrat, she and her aged girlfriends, all Democrats, are all planning on voting for McCain this November. Why?  They’re assuming that the Democratic nominee will be either Hillary Clinton, who they find totally unlikable, or Barack Obama, who they suspect is a communist.  John McCain, to them, comes across much better than either Hillary or Obama.

Of course, it is conceivable that neither Hillary nor Obama will become the Democratic nominee.  Normally, the party’s nominee is decided through the primary process long before its convention actually takes place. Through the state primaries and caucuses, one candidate acquires enough pledged delegates (2024) to guarantee a win on the convention’s first ballot. In that case, with the nominee already known before the convention begins, the convention is primarily about formally anointing the chosen nominee and whoever he selects as his running mate, and setting the theme for the presidential campaign that will follow the convention. The only mystery revolves around whether Michael Moore will shave that week.

But not this year! The experts tell us that it is almost mathematically impossible for either of the two remaining Democratic presidential candidates, Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, to acquire the needed 2024 delegates in the remaining primaries. With no nominee decided prior to the convention, this year’s Democratic convention attendees will participate in that political rarity — a “brokered convention.”

In a brokered convention, the party’s nominee is decided in a series of floor votes at the convention, usually preceded by negotiations among the party leaders and candidates. Pledged delegates will vote for the candidate to which their votes are pledged on the first ballot, but may switch their support to other candidates on successive ballots until one candidate receives a majority (2024) of votes.

The last brokered Democratic convention was 1952. Several candidates competed for the nomination, but after considerable wheeling and dealing the delegates on the third ballot elected a candidate,
Governor Adlai Stevenson of Illinois, who entered the convention saying he was not interested in running for president. 

Stevenson was a witty, highly articulate intellectual who looked, sounded, and acted more like a university professor than a politician. He lost, in a popular and electoral landslide (442 to 89 electoral votes), to Dwight Eisenhower and the Republicans. Nominated again in 1956, Stevenson and the Democrats fell victim to Eisenhower’s successful bid for re-election, losing in another popular and electoral landslide (457 to 73 electoral votes).

All of this is interesting because it appears that history is about to repeat itself. My mother-in-law and her friends may very well have a choice other than Hillary or Obama.

The Democratic Party’s brokered convention this year could go for a “dark horse,” someone who has not sought the nomination — someone like Al Gore.

In the eight years since the former vice president last held political office, he has morphed into what some might consider to be an intellectual — a former politician, a Nobel Prize winner, who is above the fray of the political gutter. In the past few years, Gore has become not unlike Adlai Stevenson — which could be good for Republicans.

Then again, the Democrats brokered convention could decide to go for one of the candidates who has already dropped out of the race, e.g. Bill Richardson or Dennis “I’m not Pinocchio” Kucinich.  That would be entertaining too!

Ken Concannon is a resident of Prince William County. E-mail him at .

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on April 27, 2008 at 12:39 am

Mr. Gore won on lies about Global Warming and the fear trumped up by him and his numerous cohorts in the media and let us not forget Hollywood. Incidentally he flew into the Global Warming concerts while his three mansions ate up enough power to light many average Joe’s houses. So i guess that makes me a “Typical white person”, or better yet i am bitter and believe in God, better yet my pastor curses God and country for 20 years while i attend his services and i ignore that. Rev. Wright is right racism is alive in America. The question is who is keeping it alive? Chris Cummings

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( jVA ) on April 25, 2008 at 2:03 pm

I really look forward to seeing John McCain run this fall.  The man has faced no real scrutiny to date and won’t until August or so when we Dems get to trot out “John McCain wants to stay in Iraq for 100 years.”

We can repeat it in every commercial.  Every speech.  Every time we’re on tv.  Replay McCain himself saying those words.  And we can do it without providing any context or insight to his words.

Remember “Al Gore invented the internet”?  How about “I voted for it before I voted against it”?  I present to you: “John McCain wants to stay in Iraq for 100 years”.  A statement that is probably reasonable and makes sense on some level turned into this year’s political gotcha.

Republicans, prepare to see the GOP’s own annoying, ridiculous tactics turned against their own candidate.  Enjoy.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Godsaveus ) on April 25, 2008 at 1:43 pm

Senator Obama was the elected candidate before his name was in the ballots, the stream media bias let him run with no scrutiny, but the Clinton machine was an unexpected strong contender. Due to the long battle between both candidates, many things came afloat are still coming, and democrats are seeing more about who is the real Obama, but it does not count, inside the democrat party the “democratic elected nominee” is Senator Barack H. Obama. He is going to bring the change in DC along with Senator Kennedy and other respectable young member of the congress.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( RonCharest ) on April 25, 2008 at 6:29 am

My mom, a lifelong Republican, called me Wednesday evening to sing the praises of Sen. Obama, and announced she would be voting for him come November.  She already recognized that Sen. Clinton no longer had a chance at the nomination.

This morning, the Wall Street Journal recognized what my mom knew Wednesday night but Ken Concannon apparently still does not; The Democrats Have a Nominee.

Its cute that Mr Concannon thinks nominating an intellectual, Al Gore, would be good for Republicans and Sen McSame.  Over the past eight years Mr Gore has won both a Nobel peace prize and an Oscar, not to mention numerous other world-class accomplishments.  Sure does put the Republican’s “No Child Left Behind” educational act in proper perspective, no?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement