A problem of location

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

Charles Reichley
Published: July 10, 2008

Oil prices dropped almost 10 dollars the first two days of this week. Unfortunately, that left oil at around 136 dollars a barrel; well over twice what is was when the Democrats took over Congress after
promising to lower the cost of oil if they were elected.  America voted to change direction, and we did.

The Washington Times says we have a “transportation funding crisis” in Virginia. You might have thought we had a transportation crisis, but if you listen to Governor Kaine, or the Democrats who control
our Senate, and even some of the old-guard Republicans in the House, our problem is that we don’t pay enough taxes.

The governor wants to raise a billion dollars through a series of tax and fee hikes, but even his buddies in the Senate reject his plan. They want a combination of a sales tax increase and a 6-cent gas tax
increase.  The House is considering a different combination of taxes.

The problem is that when Mark Warner raised our taxes by over a billion dollars he didn’t spend it on roads. We had record revenues and squandered the money on everything but transportation. Instead
of using existing tax dollars for roads, they keep asking for more.

The Northern Virginia Transportation Authority is also pushing for more local taxes so they can fix our “critical funding problem.” They promise our drive to work will be much better if we just send more
money.

But maybe we are trying to solve the wrong problem. Nobody is going to build a new bridge into Washington, D.C. Long-standing agreements block additional lanes on Interstate 66.  Each widening brings
a new wave of people moving out to the country, adding to the congestion.

Meanwhile, the Washington Post says Washington, D.C., has had enough and is fighting back against people who drive to work.  In the article “Drivers Feeling Shunned by DC,” Eric Weiss reports “the
District is escalating what some suburban commuters are calling its war against workers who drive into the city.”

It seems commuters are harming the quality of life for District residents, posing a danger to pedestrians and acting like they own the place. So the D.C. government is changing some reversible commuter
routes back to normal roads and is even looking to shut down the I-395 tunnel. The AAA spokesperson claims D.C. may become “the most anti-car city in the country.”

So while Richmond looks to collect a billion dollars to build bigger roads, D.C. is putting up a “no entrance” sign at the border.  Meanwhile, Forbes Magazine says we have the third most expensive
commute in the country, about 13 dollars a day. The U.S. Census says we spend over an hour a day driving to and from work.

It seems to me we don’t have a transportation problem, we have a location problem. People want to live out here in Prince William County, but their jobs are in D.C.  Rather than move into the District,
these commuters would rather we all pay more in taxes to make the drive easier.

But with gas prices above four bucks, commuting not only wastes time and gasoline, but it’s getting very expensive. What if instead of raising taxes to build more roads to move more people in and out of
D.C., we brought the government jobs out here where people live? 

At 13 dollars each day, you’d spend over $3000 a year commuting to D.C. Better roads might shave a few hundred bucks off that price. A Prius might cut it in half. But if you could work in Manassas,
you’d save over $2000 dollars and about 40 minutes a day.  And it would reduce congestion.

The FBI just opened a facility here. We have the space, we have the local roads, we have the infrastructure and we have the trained work force. 

We just need to move the jobs here We live in the internet age.  We are connected globally. It won’t be easy — but it could be easier than the alternatives. 

Some might argue that D.C. would be harmed if we did this.  But D.C. seems tired of the transient workforce and would just as soon see fewer people on their streets. Two thousand dollars per worker,
per year, is a huge incentive to consider radical solutions.  Cutting congestion, using less gas and causing less pollution are just icing on the cake.

Charles Reichley has been a Prince William County resident since 1981. He can be reached at critically .

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( RonCharest ) on July 11, 2008 at 11:59 am

You’re very welcome, Sammy B,

You’re correct about countries now trading in Euros vice dollars.  There is a lot of evidence that Bush’s timing for invading Iraq was to stop Saddam from converting his choice of oil currency over to Euros.  The way I understand it, had Saddam done so it would have started a “chain reacion” of all other mid-east countries following, and our dollar would have been decimated within months. 

So now, after nearly five years of war, thousands of US soldiers killed and wounded, hundreds of thousands of Iraqis killed or wounded with 2 million displaced, their country in tatters, our economy a wreck, and Iran developing into a regional powerhouse; oil producing countries are converting over to Euros anyway.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Sammy B ) on July 10, 2008 at 8:49 pm

Thank you Mr. Charest. That factor had slipped my mind. It is true that many nations are now trading oil in euros rather than dollars thanks to the drop in our currency’s value. And let’s not forget, speaking of China, who owns most of our national debt.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( RonCharest ) on July 10, 2008 at 12:39 pm

China’s increased oil consumption, along with other developing nations such as India, are a large factor in increased prices. But the single biggest cause is due to our devalued dollar.

The US dollar has been the world’s standard in pricing oil since WWII. The value of our money is now rapidly dropping (showing up in dropping exchange rates with all major world currencies) due to the way we’ve been borrowing since Bush took over. 

Our war on Iraq is costing about $2 Billion a week (or even more, depending on who you listen to), and all of that is borrowed money.  We’re now the world’s single largest debtor nation, vacuuming up money from whoever and wherever we can borrow from.  That amounts to increased risk, decreased confidence in our economy, and a devalued dollar. 

Our rapidly devaluing dollar is why oil prices have shot up so high, so quickly.  Drilling for more oil will do little to nothing to solve this problem.  As our economy goes further into the tank, thanks to bush’s splendid little war, oil prices in US dollars will continue to climb.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Sammy B ) on July 10, 2008 at 10:55 am

Mr. Charest makes an excellent point. I am going to go out on a limb and estimate that Bush’s choice to invade an oil-producing nation did far more to increase the price of oil than anything the Democratic Congress has done. However, I do not put most of the blame on Bush, either, to be honest. While our little war has certainly added a few dollars to the price of a barrel, the exponentially increasing consumption by China has probably been the most important factor in the price increase.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( RonCharest ) on July 10, 2008 at 7:29 am

After a gratuitous swipe at the 18 month-old Democratic controlled Congress, once again blaming them for the Bush administration’s failure to have a national energy policy, Mr. Reichley presents a novel idea for solving our transportation crisis; Don’t make the workers come to the city, let’s bring the city to the workers!

Of all the half-baked lets-make-water-run-uphill proposals for solving Northern Virginia’s commuting problem, this has to be the most ridiculous.

Using Mr. Reichley’s example of the FBI opening an office in Manassas; I’m sure the people who will be working there, who actually live in the Manassas area, are thrilled at the short commute.  But I suspect the folks who live in Maryland, now having to double their driving distance, are not.  News flash to Mr. Reichley; Prince William County is not the entire world.  It’s not even a big part of the entire world.

The Republican’s war on Iraq was evaluated by the Congressional Research Service (CRS) to be costing $2 Billion Per Week.  That is every week of every month of every year we are there. 

In other words, the Billion dollars Mr. Reichley claims it would cost Virginia to solve our transportation problems could be raised merely through 3-1/2 days of not making war on Iraq.  I’m sure Mr. Reichley will discuss this in a future column.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( mrbill ) on July 10, 2008 at 6:23 am

charles reichley we’ve been here since 1966 what should we do?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Sammy B ) on July 10, 2008 at 12:54 am

Perhaps the federal government could be lobbied have other agencies follow the FBI’s lead and create offices in northern Virginia and southern Maryland. It would save the states money on transportation infrastructure and save federal employees gas money. Additionally, while I am not a civil engineer, I would guess that it is less expensive to expand bus service than it is to expand roads and highways. Perhaps PWC could create a partnership with WMATA to make it easier for county commuters to reach Metro stations by public transit.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement