Adequate school funding

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

Grant Lattin
Published: March 8, 2008

The Prince William Board of County Supervisors will vote this Tuesday to set an advertised tax rate for next year’s budget. The rate they set on Tuesday will be the maximum rate they can approve in April. Several members of the Board of Supervisors were elected because they claimed to support education, yet some members have made statements proving they are either misinformed about our public schools or they simply choose to ignore the facts.

As reported in the Potomac News, one member of the Board of County Supervisors said he was concerned that the school’s central office staff is top-heavy. The most recent data from the Educational Research Services shows that per pupil expenditures for central office and school board services in Prince William County are 44 percent below the national average.

This same board member was concerned about a new administration building. This new building is needed for exactly the same good reasons that the Board of Supervisors recently finished building a new county administration office adjacent to the McCoart Building. Much of our central school staff is currently housed at Independent Hill in old trailers and World War II vintage buildings where some employees have to walk a significant distance outside their trailer to another trailer just to use a bathroom.

Last year the county’s schools received $32 million less than anticipated in county funding. The School Board has recently been informed that it must cut an additional $6 million from the superintendent’s proposed budget during this budget cycle even if the rate is set at the highest rate discussed by the Board of Supervisors this past Tuesday. When state funding is decreasing, we are at risk of not being able to provide the essential educational services that our children require. 

Our citizens should know the facts about county revenues. Our county demands from its citizens the lowest revenue per capita in Northern Virginia. The latest data (provided by the county’s staff in October 2007) for Fiscal Year 2005 ranges from a high in Arlington County of $3,599 revenue per capita to a low in our county of $2,033. Our county’s citizens also enjoy one of the highest levels of per capita income in the U.S.

Our citizens need assurance that our schools are run efficiently.  According to the latest available data from the Washington Area Boards of Education, our county schools have the lowest per pupil expenditure of the nine reporting school systems. The high was Alexandria at $19,341 per student and the low was Prince William County at $10,429. A recent study by the Clare Boothe Luce Policy Institute looked at whether school divisions in Virginia used public dollars cost-efficiently. It concluded that Prince William County Schools were among the state leaders in producing better student achievement results at a lower taxpayer cost.

In 2007, a school efficiency review was completed that will eventually evaluate all school districts in the commonwealth. This program’s goal is to identify cost savings in non-instructional areas to ensure that maximum funds are redirected towards classroom activities. Our superintendent volunteered our district for this state-sponsored, external efficiency review. Our staff was given high marks for utilizing best practices in its efficient management and administration of a school district that employs more than 10,000 people and serves more than 70,000 students. Many of these recommendations have already been implemented. More than 86 cents of each dollar in the proposed budget goes directly to schools and instructional programs. 

Almost 78 percent of the proposed budget is for compensation-related expenditures. Staff compensation in Prince William County is the lowest in Northern Virginia. The proposed budget this year includes a pay increase for staff and teachers that will enable them to at least keep up with the region, but it still does not permit us to achieve parity. 

Growth is our biggest challenge.  Based upon a building space audit initiated by our superintendent, existing space has been fully utilized and no new trailers have been purchased since his arrival more than two years ago. Our 10-year Capital Improvement Plan will adequately build new facilities and renovate or expand existing facilities. This is critical in a county where growth was nearly 2000 students this year and another 2000 expected next year. Public schools cannot turn these children away.  Teachers, textbooks and classrooms must be provided for all. At roughly $10,000 per student, such growth requires an additional $20 million per year just to maintain the status quo.

It is essential for the Board of County Supervisors to ensure that education receives the level of funding that our children deserve.

Grant Lattin is a member of the Prince William County School Board. He represents the occoquan District.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( pwcparent ) on March 10, 2008 at 6:58 am

More FUZZY MATH Mr Lattin?
According to the WASE Report, PWCS teachers have higher starting salaries and higher max salaries than Fairfax County teachers when adjusted for the fact that PWC teachers only work 7 hours per day but Fairfax County Teachers must work 7.5 hours per day.  The days worked is only 1 day more for Fairfax County.  Also shows where a lot of those “cost saving” measures are because PWC has considerably larger elem class sizes than Fairfax County.  Also notable that PWCS have proportionately more top administrators than Fairfax County does when you consider that FFX has more than 2x the enrollment as PWC.
Read Report here:  http://www.acps.k12.va.us/board/wabe.pdf

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( hacenedb ) on March 08, 2008 at 7:41 pm

I am among those who strongly believe that our public schools are serving more and more a huge bureaucracy made up of a superintendent, a deputy superintendent, 8 associate superintendents, about 58 supervisors, 14 directors, and other offices used for services unrelated to the teaching mission. These offices divert almost 5 million dollars from the school budget. Meanwhile, our teachers are represented by a bunch of opportunists whose job is to keep all teachers on the payroll even if they do not perform at the expected level. Solution: The focus must be on the staff running the day-t-day classroom operations that is the best and brightest teachers and the principals and their team. The remainder has to be eliminated. This includes the school board and the top level management that are siphoning the money away from the schools. In doing so, the money will be invested in the classroom.  As for the management of our schools and in order to minimize redundancies, the County Executive should take over. This will end overspending, over staffing, and overcrowding. You see bureaucracies will always claim that without them nothing can survive, we dare say the opposite!Once again, the public schools’ mandate is to educate our children not to entertain bureaucrats. We must have the courage to address this problem to make sure the education mission of our schools is not manipulated by a group of bureaucrats whose vested interest is a big check at the end of the month at the expense of our children. I agree with Mr. Poisson and some of the representatives in Richmond who are pushing for doing away with school boards altogether.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( zcxnissan ) on March 08, 2008 at 5:04 pm

Thankfully illegal immigrants are leaving, will they be taking their anchor babies with them? Or will school overcrowding still be a problem. Good thing Va. has good teachers and schools to compensate for such a low budget. Don’t want to end up with the messy illegal immigrant problem of Fairfax and Arlington Counties as well as havens D.C and Maryland.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( phdee ) on March 08, 2008 at 12:14 pm

The school budget needs to be cut. PWC has embarked upn its ethnic cleansing program to get rid of illegal immigrants. The cost is now estimated to be more than double its origin al estimate. The cleansing program will, of course, be declared successful. A common complaint fromStewart, other BOCS members, Help Save Manassas, Letiecq, aznd the anti-immigrant crowd is that the illegals are overwhelming schhol and services here. Because PWC has implemented its “get rid” of immigrant policy, there will be fewer students in the schools. Thus, we will need fewer teachers, fewer schools, fewer administrators, etc. So we might as well start now to implements this “successful to be” ethnic cleansing program and resolution. Also, the economy ismor has collapsed - the wild spending orgies are over. We can’t keep raising taxes to cover the loss of tax revenue from exotic spending. The schools here are as good as they will ever get.  No need to keep pouring money into a deep endless hole.  Time for some reality to the situation - and some cuts.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( G. Hecht ) on March 08, 2008 at 11:44 am

Oh Mr Lattin…you ARE a pure politician to the bone because your article mixes facts with words designed to deceive the casual reader.  As a taxpayer in this county, I have to ask why having a great school system that produces highly educated students at the lowest cost per student is a bad thing as implied several times in your comments? And don’t talk to me about any pay raise until you address why the superintendent, who makes more than the President of the United States, needs a pay raise. Does Mr Walts have more responsibility than Pres Bush? And as for PWC enjoying one of the highest per capita income rates in the U.S. and the forecasted student population growth next year, a good look at reality shows that both will drop given the new county approach toward immigration and your acceptance of Math Investigations into PWCS…illegal immigrants and the thousands of high-paying transient government professions, like military members, are avoiding PWC and flocking to neighboring counties who use traditional math, not fuzzy math, to educate our children.  And as for “some employees having to walk a significant distance outside just to go to the bathroom”, unless they are covered by the Americans With Disabilities Act, most taxpayers would call that “great exercise”...something that our children are not getting under your watch.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement