The tragedy of an ignorant electorate
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
James Simpson
Published: November 7, 2008
It is a sad time for Virginia and a tragic time for America. The only thing more dangerous than our two-party political system is having one party in complete control.
Most Americans have little money saved. What’s even worse, Americans seem to appreciate the information deprivation environment created by those seeking the power of political office.
I have no doubt that more than 50 percent of the people in Prince William County don’t even know who their representatives are … at any level in government. An even greater number — perhaps 90
percent — likely couldn’t tell you where candidates really stand on specific issues. And I would hazard a guess that as many as 99 percent have no idea how the people they just elected or reelected
actually voted while in office.
People talk about voting as a civic duty or responsibility. Hogwash. An individual’s responsibility is being educated about the issues as well as the backgrounds of the men and women upon whom they
are about to entrust a significant amount of power. It is wholly irresponsible to vote the way so many people do … through emotional manipulation. The problem has become so bad in this nation that at
this point I would not oppose a screening test. If you can’t answer a couple simple questions about the candidates on the ballot, you aren’t allowed to move to the next screen and actually select one of
them to legislate. We have a test for driving, which requires that you understand the meaning of certain road signs. Yet an uneducated driver is significantly less dangerous than people electing
representatives to office who are in charge of the world’s largest military without these voters knowing what the issues are and where the candidates stand.
It astounds me that so many people are such staunch Republicans or Democrats. They walk the party line, chanting slogans and sound bites like good little automatons .
I try hard to believe that America is not comprised mostly of idiots, but sometimes it is just impossible to ignore (especially during election season). Hey, I am no genius. There are a lot of really smart
people out there — physicists, doctors, economists, etc. In many cases, I probably couldn’t learn or understand a quarter of what they know even after spending years of my life trying to do so.
Unfortunately, when it comes to our government, most Americans are little more than lemmings controlled by a system designed to keep us ignorant and compliant. The true audacity is not that of hope,
but that of politicians who so easily get people to fall for their rhetoric.
People vote one party into power … that political party screws up (usually due to some problem with the economy). Then Americans turn around and vote the other party into power … and that one
screws up (again, usually due to some problem with the economy). But like cows in line for slaughter, voters seem to have neither the gumption nor the mental capacity to understand that we are being
played by a ravenous two-party system designed to keep each other in power at the taxpayer’s expense.
So down the road to socialist ruin we travel. Our masters are happy that we aren’t intelligent enough to vote for a candidate who believes in significantly cutting spending as well as one who understands
that government is, and has always been, the root of the problem … not the solution.
Americans seem unable to learn from history. Attention spans are so short that sound bites are all that most are capable of absorbing. Everyone hears the words “hope” and “change” and “universal
health care” and have no clue about the consequences of the direction we are now accelerating headlong into.
Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security are expected to leave the United States with a shortfall of over $52 trillion, and that is a conservative estimate.
On Oct 13, Bill Sardi wrote an article for LewRockwell.com. In it he quotes a GAO (Government Accountability Office) report from April 2008 titled “The Nation’s Long Term Fiscal Outlook.” Sardi
paraphrases the report to point out that “The public doesn’t understand this money grab and believes their medical bills will be covered with passage of a universal health insurance package, not
recognizing their tax bill will rise overall and that their country is headed for insolvency even without universal health care.”
It’s amusing to see politicians already backpedaling on what they are going to deliver. During the campaign, Obama himself started backpedaling and flip-flopping. Those who know better understand that
campaign promises are mostly lies. How’s that for change?
James Simpson lives in Lake Ridge.
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Reader Reactions
Posted by ( Equality 7-2521 ) on November 13, 2008 at 10:59 am
Finally, for the record, I consider the term ‘conservative’ as ugly a term as the word ‘liberal.‘“
Present company excepted, of course.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Equality 7-2521 ) on November 13, 2008 at 10:56 am
RonCharest,
I understand the point you’re trying to make, and I don’t disagree with the underlying premise that alternatives must always be considered. But ideas and people should be considered on their merits, not by the labels attached to them. Calling something liberalism or conservatism brings an automatic element of bias to the table.
Also, my reason for asking why scropio thought Obama was “the most radical, left-wing liberal presidential candidate ever in US history” was to try to understand what exactly made scorpio think this way.
Finally, for the record, I consider the term “conservative” as ugly a term as the word “liberal.“
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( RonCharest ) on November 13, 2008 at 10:31 am
Equality 7-2521,
I agree with you that “extremism” on either side is a bad thing. But I’m trying to make a point; being “Liberal” is not a bad thing. In my opinion, our political map has shifted way too far to the right over these past years, to the point were once “radical right-wing” ideas are now considered mainstream.
For example; torture, letting people die from lack of affordable health care, denying workers the right to unionize, and denying women access to birth control (never mind forcing women to carry any and every pregneancy to term regardless of the circumstances of conception) are now routinely discussed in our media as “acceptable.“ Liberal alternatives such as; Torture being a violation of basic human rights, universal access to healthcare as a basic human right, free choice of workers to unionize, and women’s right to chose, are all considered extreme radical left-wing concepts, even though these issues are accepted and normal as public policy in many industrialized nations.
As a more local example of what I’m talking about, go check out the thread on “We did not all want Obama’s change.“ In a culture that valued sane, balanced, rational political discourse Pwanon’s rants would be considered the writings of a lunatic. Here, he actually has other people agreeing with him.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Equality 7-2521 ) on November 13, 2008 at 9:22 am
RonCharest,
I voted for Obama and I don’t think he’s a radical left-winger either, but I’m glad for that. I think you identified why taking extreme positions in any direction is a bad thing: we get a Bush-like presidency. By that I mean we get an administration that ignores good ideas from the “other side” simply because they came from that other side.
Also, I think it’s wrong to assume that America voted for a “liberal” president. America voted against politics as usual. If Obama takes extreme-left positions throughout his term he probably won’t see a second. For my part, I think he’s a very astute politician who will take centrist positions on the important issues.
I’m also confident he’ll listen to good ideas coming out of the GOP camp, rather than simply throwing them away. The GOP is in trouble right now, but they’re far from dead. A solid minority voted for McCain. And if Obama ignores that minority (as Bush did), then he does so at his own political peril because it would mean he’s learned nothing.
By the way, my biggest concern is not the GOP, but Pelosi and other similar people from Obama’s own party that may short circuit his goal of being President to both “sides.“
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( RonCharest ) on November 13, 2008 at 8:40 am
Equality 7-2521,
Even if President-Elect Obama is “the most radical, left-wing liberal presidential candidate ever in US history,” why is that bad?
We’re just getting past the most radical, right-wing conservative president (vice president) in American history, and look where we are. Why not let a president try a hard-core liberal approach? We couldn’t possibly be any worse off than we are now.
Unfortunately, President-elect Obama is anything but a radical liberal. I wish he was, but I still support him.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Equality 7-2521 ) on November 13, 2008 at 7:47 am
scorpio,
What exactly makes Obama “the most radical, left-wing liberal presidential candidate ever in US history”?
Also, why don’t you take a look at factcheck.org before talking about Obama’s “undeniable ties with people like William Ayers, Tony Rezko, Frank Davis Marshall, Rashid Khalidi. . . .“
And what does it matter who gave Obama money? Giving money to political candidates is just another form of political expression.
Also, Obama has no control over who endorses him, so what does that prove? Should we judge McCain based on the KKK endorsing him? Do you see what a stupid argument that is now?
Finally, I’m curious about how exactly you think Obama is going to lead this country down a path to destruction? What do you think he’s going to do to make our county’s situation any worse than it already is?
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( scorpio ) on November 12, 2008 at 12:13 pm
In respond to Equality 7-2521:
“Brainless” is always “Brainless” regardless. The biased “envolvement” of actors and pop stars to the most brainless part of the electorate was more than obvious and it was acknowledged and regularly reported by the media. How else could the electorate vote for the most radical, left-wing liberal presidential candidate ever in US history who has undeniable ties with people like William Ayers, Tony Rezko, Frank Davis Marshall, Rashid Khalidi…?
And have you not heard of the financial support Obama received from Lesbian Gay Bisexual and Transgendered Community Center? Or NARAL?
You might have not heard that the official HAMAS’ speaker made a statement that they will be very happy if Obama wins.
At least you acknowledge there is “the right” and “the wrong” way.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Equality 7-2521 ) on November 08, 2008 at 9:50 am
Here’s a quote that pretty much sums up what’s going on in America right now:
“Change has a considerable psychological impact on the human mind. To the fearful it is threatening because it means that things may get worse. To the hopeful it is encouraging because things may get better. To the confident it is inspiring because the challenge exists to make things better.“
~King Whitney Jr.
I am both encouraged and inspired. And I see America returning to its status as that “shining city upon a hill” that John Winthrop wrote about and President Reagan (another great orator) reminded us of.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( rafaelva ) on November 08, 2008 at 9:21 am
This same “ignorant electorate” has been the byline of the right since before Andrew Jackson. From Jackson onward the the people have demanded their Right. The right to vote.
Jackson’s “Democracy” party was opposed by the then named “New Republicans”. It was the New Republicans that used the dumb electorate line during the Jackson era, they referred to the people who belonged to and who voted for the Democracy party candidates as being “dumb as mules”.
Mr. Simpson just continues the oldest political byline in the United States. The electorate is too dumb to be given the right to choose the government over them.
We are reminded that having a Congress controlled by the same party as the President is not a good thing. Well we do have that on good authority.
Eight of the last Ten years, the Congress was controlled by Republicans, and Six of those last Eight we had a Republican President. What a gift to the American People that has been.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Equality 7-2521 ) on November 08, 2008 at 9:09 am
“The media machine together with the Hollywood, Gay and Lesbians movements, rock and rap “stars” can do a lot of damage to the brainless majority of the voting power.“
It seems that the majority is only “brainless” when it votes against what people like you believe to be the “right way”(i.e., against your opinions).
And I didn’t know that Hollywood, Gays and Lesbians, and musicians had so much power over the electorate. The GOP spent so much time telling Americans that we were the reason America always come back from any set back (very true, by the way). But now that the election came out the “wrong way” it seems we’re no more than mindless sheep who have taken this country down a path to destruction. So which is it?
Report Inappropriate Comment