Value to foreclosures in PWC?
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
Davon Gray
Published: July 27, 2008
One of the sweetest and most refreshing drinks in the world is a cold glass of lemonade. How ironic it is that it comes from the sourest fruit available — the lemon. It’s where we get the phrase make \
lemonade out of lemons. In my opinion, that phrase should always inspire our thinking. By nature, I am an eternal optimist and believe that any situation can be made for good. So when I heard about the
foreclosure epidemic, I began to wonder what could become a lemonade experience out of it.
Then it struck me. Now is a great time to fill a lot of the houses that have already been foreclosed to target populations that so desperately and so deservingly need attention. I am referring to those public
servants who live in our communities. Folks such as teachers, firefighters and police officers. Now would be a great time to target foreclosed housing for these groups.
The idea would work like this: a house that has been foreclosed and has been on the market for a considerable time is costing the banks money. Obviously they would like to sell it. And, considering that
it is foreclosed, they would want to sell the house to someone who will most likely not foreclose again. The property could be offered at the foreclosed rate, while hopefully lowering the interest rate as
well, for people designated as a teacher, firefighter or police officer.
Obviously a person would have to qualify in regards to credit, but at least the program could negate the down payment and maybe lower the interest rate or the closing costs. Such a program would allow
the banks to not have to eat the costs of unsold foreclosures and allow the most valuable of our communities to not be priced out of the housing market and to obtain a piece of the American Dream.
This could be ideal for a place like Prince William County. Back in May, I read an article that said Prince William County had the highest rate of foreclosures in Virginia, totaling an estimated 5,500
homes. That is astounding when you think about it.
Also, I found out the Prince William County Board of Supervisors had recently looked at a similar program, concentrating on ways to offer county workers lower interest rates. I have not heard the status of
their efforts, but hopefully they will get something done because the idea makes sense.
But one thing is for sure, Congress needs to be involved in any effort. I would rather see Congress invest in homes for teachers, firefighters and police officers than just another bailout for Fannie and
Freddie Mac. Or if nothing else, make this a part of any bailout.
Bailing out a major industry, this time the housing industry and last time the savings and loan industry, only solves the immediate need but seldom handles the long term problems of personal and
corporate greed. Loopholes are often created for the industry being reformed, and those who created the crisis find a way around the reforms.
Congress is considering a housing bill to provide $300 billion in loan guarantees to help at- risk borrowers refinance into a more viable mortgage aimed at folks who might have had adjustable rate
mortgage.
That might be a good idea, but what about those houses already in foreclosure — the ones that are bringing down property values and are targets for crime in neighborhoods?
If Congress, state government and local governments will commit to this effort, foreclosure and the need for affordable housing for public servants could become that sweet glass of lemonade made from
this bucket of lemons called the mortgage crisis.
It’s an idea that costs you and me less and certainly would provide our communities a valuable commodity — more public servants. If anyone cares to respond, I would be interested in what you think
about this.
Davon Gray works in Washington, D.C., and resides in Woodbridge. Contact him at .
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Reader Reactions
Posted by ( phdee ) on July 29, 2008 at 2:47 pm
Cobra should explain how PWC got so many people who had no substantial income for houses since PWC is foreclosure capital. The fact is the houses were grossly overpriced - and the public had been brainwashed into believeing a house was an investment rather than a place to live.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( phdee ) on July 28, 2008 at 8:12 pm
Thhis is a dumb idea, whether from the PWC BOCS, you, or anyone else.
(1) Reminds me of company stores and houses in coal mining history;
(2) Is socialist or communist in nature;
(3) Favors one group over another, i.e. discriminations based on occupation;
(4) Would be a burden on taxpsayers;
(5) These workers enjoy above average pay and benefits; find another job if more money is needed;
(6) Sets a dangerous precedent; shall wwe have stores with several layers of prices, depending on occupation?;
For those who think it is wonderful, are they willing to pay more taxes? Do the less fortunate workers need similar help, with housing, food, utilities, etc?
Let’s just forget this horrible idea. Let the markerplace determione what goes on. And the immigration resolution should be reviewed amd proper bla,e given for part of the foreclosure mess.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( cobra ) on July 28, 2008 at 1:54 pm
I’m 100% behind that program. I am also against any bailout for the mortgage industry. They made bad decisions making loans to those that had no sustainable income. When times get tough, they just up and left with little regard for the community. We would absolutely love to have public servants as neighbors.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Vic ) on July 28, 2008 at 1:33 pm
With all due respect to Mr. Gray and his ideas, I must object to the idea of using taxpayer dollars to further subsidize the already generous set of wages and allowances available to county employees.
While county leaders may indeed be able to play a role in alleviating the supply of foreclosed homes in the region, I would reject any initiative that provides county employees a special advantage over other hard-working but lesser paid residents of the county. What’s more—I would sternly reject any initiative that might result in higher taxes in order to pay for this initiative.
A better way to approach the issue of the overabundance of foreclosed properties within the county would be to curtail and restrict the number of additional new homes that will be permitted to be built within the county—especially since hundreds of acres of scenic green space are still being bulldozed under each and every week to make way for countless “McMansions”—townhouse communities with few community facilities, services or amenities—and other high-priced but uncontrolled growth and development.
What we should be doing is incentivizing those who will invest in renewing and reclaiming older properties within the county—as part of a more sustainable, coherent and long term growth and development strategy.
And if the salaries of county employees like teachers, police and firefighters are truly not quite what some might like them to be—then there are numerous other ways to address it—that don’t necessary require the taxpayer funded purchase and management of a special category of low income housing that is restricted solely to county employees.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( someguy ) on July 28, 2008 at 1:33 pm
That’s a great plan, if you are a teacher, firefighter or police officer. For everyone else, it’s a waste of taxes. For prospective home buyers that don’t fit the criteria, it means you are forced to compete on bids with teacher/fire/police people with an unfair advantage. What about other “noble” professions (EMT’s, nurses, pastors/priests)? Why should they get the short end of the stick?
If you want to help the housing market, let the market work on its own. Sales in PWC have jumped as prices have come down to more realistic levels. This program would use tax dollars to artificially prop up the price, which would slow home sales.
If you want to help teachers/fire/police or any other specific category of government worker, give them raises so everyone can compete on an equal footing.
Fairfax Co. bought into this gimmick, I would like to think PWC is smarter than that. And I should disclose that my wife is a teacher, and we would likely qualify for the program.
Report Inappropriate Comment