What we know about Obama
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
Ken Concannon
Published: April 17, 2008
I don’t agree with Hillary Clinton often. Actually, this is probably the first time.
But I think she’s got it absolutely right when she says that Barack Obama is an elitist. He is. Of course, so is she. But Hillary’s elitism is a concept long established. So it’s not news. Obama’s elitism, on the other hand, is something we only suspected — until April 6, when Obama confided with the rich folk at a fund raiser on Billionaire’s Row in San Francisco his thoughts about small-town America:
“You go into some of these small towns in Pennsylvania, a lot of them — like a lot of small towns in the Midwest, the jobs have been gone now for 25 years and nothing’s replaced them.
And they’ve gone through the Clinton administration, and the Bush administration, and each successive administration has said that somehow these communities are gonna regenerate and they have not. So it’s not surprising then that they get bitter, and they cling to guns, or religion, or antipathy toward people who aren’t like them, or anti-immigrant sentiment, or anti-trade sentiment as a way to explain their frustrations.”
Explaining to rich people why people who aren’t rich “cling to guns, or religion,” equating religious attitudes with “antipathy toward people who aren’t like them,” and attributing religious beliefs to economic bitterness is what one would expect a liberal elitist to say to other elitists. But you don’t expect the elitist politician to say that publicly, while being videotaped. The fact that Barack Obama said what he said while on camera tells us two things about him. First, he’s an elitist.
Second, he’s not all that bright. With primaries still looming in states where small town American values (religion, Second Amendment rights, etc.) predominate (Pennsylvania, Indiana, West Virginia, Kentucky, North Carolina) the public expression of attitudes hostile to the mores of the local electorate is usually considered to be political stupidity.
Having committed what the pundits like to call a gaffe, the not-so-bright elitist has fallen prey to a television attack ad approved by Hillary Clinton but featuring citizens from Pennsylvania’s Lehigh valley — home of Allentown, Easton, Bethlehem and really small towns like Neffs, Palmerton, and Schnecksville (where my wife’s grandparents owned a small farm). In the advertisement, the Pennsylvanians express considerable umbrage at Obama’s elitist characterization of their religious and political beliefs as a consequence of economic bitterness. Like most people I know, they attribute their religious beliefs and attitudes to a variety of things that have nothing to do with economics.
When Barack Obama first announced his intention to seek the Democratic nomination for president almost two years ago, the typical response to his announcement was “Who?” Nobody knew who he was. Even some members of the Senate, where he was serving his first term, didn’t know him. Some senators in his own party referred to him as Osama Obama, not knowing him any better.
After a few television interviews and debates, the persona of a well-spoken, charismatic black man began to emerge. He came across, at first, as a breath of fresh air, an alternative to the “business as usual” politicians who were also seeking the Democratic nomination. Billing himself as an apostle of change, he has succeeded in eliminating all but one candidate for the Democratic nomination, the early odds-on favorite Hillary Clinton, who trails his delegate count by a relative handful of delegates.
But with political success comes exposure. We now know that Obama has the most liberal voting record in the Senate. We know that his idea of change will not only dramatically increase our taxes but move us closer to the socialist nanny state so many of us deplore.
We know that his spiritual mentor for the past twenty years, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, is a racist who, from his public statements, apparently hates the
United States. We know that his attempts to convince the public that he was unaware of the reverend’s views lack credibility.
And now we know that Barack Obama is a liberal elitist.
Ken Concannon is a resident of Prince William County. E-mail him at .
Page 1 of 1
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.

Reader Reactions
Posted by ( barnun ) on April 25, 2008 at 2:21 pm
did I enclose the cbs link ?
http://www.cbsnews.com/blogs/2008/04/01/politics/horserace/entry3985914.shtml
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( barnun ) on April 25, 2008 at 2:19 pm
CBS news is known to be very liberal and here is an article from them about McCains comments on 100 yrs in Iraq. McCain never said lets have 100 more years of war. McCain has spoken out against the war but stated that if our guys are there, then commit and do what is neccessary to succeed. He’s always felt that if we are there, we should have had more troops on the ground, and got the country stable and peaceful quickly as what everyone originally thought would be the case. In WWII when the allied troops gathered to cross the river to enter Germany ( to end the war) there were 1 million allied soldiers gathered for that battle. That ended the war in germany. Again, we study history to look at past outcomes to determine future action. McCain was actually fighting to make sure Iraq did not turn into another vietnam.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( barnun ) on April 25, 2008 at 1:41 pm
Ron, let the readers read for themselves. here is one link. I’d guess most on here know how to use google.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1084711/posts
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( RonCharest ) on April 23, 2008 at 2:24 pm
Check your facts, Barnun.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( barnun ) on April 23, 2008 at 1:40 pm
Ron, You do a really nice job of twisting words and making them mean something completely different. Actually McCain passed up a chance to leave POW early in respect to his comrads and ended up staying 5 more years. His funny stance is due to having both of his shoulders broken while being a pow. I dont think you’ll find many vets speaking out against McCain for vietnam. As for his comments for how long we’ll be in Iraq, again twisted words. We very well could be there for a very long time as a peace keeping base as we are in Germany, Korea etc. You also seem upset that he’s old enough to see the results of actions. This is why we study history in school, to determine future actions based on past outcomes. It’s only fair to point out to the readers that you told an outright lie on your hypocrisy page. You are certainly welcome to your own opinion but quit telling half truths and whole lies to sway others to your clouded views.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( RonCharest ) on April 22, 2008 at 12:38 pm
If I were looking at all three resumes, McCain’s would still be last pick.
1) He flip-flops all over the map on issues
2) Panders to religious fanatics who believe the Catholic Church is a “False Religion,“ and calls the Pope the “Anti-Christ.“
3) Is hated by many Vietnam Veterans groups for his willingness to accept favored treatment during his POW days, and lack of willingness to help fellow veterans as Senator.
4) Would keep us in Iraq for 100 years, allowing our troops to be killed, military destroyed, and our country bankrupted, all while not addressing the root causes and key figures of terrorism.
4) Was born before the Golden Gate Bridge was built.
Yep, last choice without even looking at which political party he’s aligned with.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( barnun ) on April 22, 2008 at 9:47 am
It’s funny, whenever I read someone trying to support Obama it comes down to diversion. “look at them” and “he brings change” Obama is still a man without a resume, without qualifying experience, and a questionable background. Next we have Hillary, another candidate without experience and a criminially questionable background. McCain was not my first choice either but I’d take him out of the 3. We all have to remember also that regardless of our opinion of what is going on in the middle east, the next president inherits all of it. Read their resumes and the requirements of the job for which they apply. disregard, race, age,gender and charisma. Think of it as hiring a contractor to remodel your house.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( jVA ) on April 18, 2008 at 7:38 pm
“And now we know that Barack Obama is a liberal elitist. “
Hey! I was looking forward to seeing the Republican echo chamber in action today. Thanks so much, Mr. Concannon. I’m glad to see you got your talking points in the mail and went to work in a timely manner.
Blah blah blah blah blah blah.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( RonCharest ) on April 18, 2008 at 5:29 am
Interesting, since John Baer, columnist for the Philadelphia Daily News, agrees with Sen Obama (philly.com, April 14, John Baer, “Decades of working-class neglect - now that’s insulting”) about small-town Philadelphia residents being bitter. He must be a liberal though, so his well-written opinion doesn’t count.
But I think it’s cute how Concannon dropped in the gratuitous “Obama-Osama” quip. And cute how Concannon never writes about McCain endorser Pastor Hagee, who considers the Catholic church a “False Religion,“ and calls the Pope the “Anti-Christ.“
Sure is going to be a long election season.
Report Inappropriate Comment