Why you should vote Republican

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

Charles Reichley
Published: October 22, 2008

In 2006, a majority of Americans found no reason to reelect Republicans, and they put Democrats in charge in Washington. Despite the disastrous consequences and a nine percent congressional
approval rating, some people are considering voting for Democrats again.

Here are five reasons to vote Republican this time around. 

One: The economy — Republicans are better for your pocketbook.

When Republicans took Congress in 1994, the Dow was at 3800.  In 2006, when Democrats took Congress, the Dow was at 12,500.  After two years of Democrats control, the Dow is well below 10,000. 

When the financial world was failing, Speaker Nancy Pelosi and Senate Majority leader Harry Reid said they had no idea what to do. They waited for the Republican president send them a bill. Obama
said to call if he was needed. McCain suspended his campaign to deal with the crisis.

McCain tried to fix the mortgage problems years ago, but the Democrats blocked him, protecting their buddies who made millions on the mortgage mess. Democrats forced banks to give mortgages to
people who couldn’t afford them.  This drove up the cost of homes for everybody, and then crashed the market, leaving responsible homeowners like you holding the bag.

Two: Oil prices — Democratic policies drove prices up, Republicans brought them down.

In 2006, oil was around $60 a barrel. Two years of Democrats blocking drilling and attacking oil companies drove gas to $4.10 and oil to $147. This killed the economy and drove people out of work. 

Democrats said offshore drilling wouldn’t help. But there were enough Republicans in the Senate to keep Democrats from continuing the drilling ban. Since the ban expired, gas is down to $2.69, and oil
prices are around $70. If we elect Democrats like Mark Warner, who opposes offshore oil drilling, they will reenact the ban and gas prices will soar again. If you don’t want $5 gasoline, vote Republican.

Three: National security — McCain is an experienced veteran, Obama an untested rookie.

Joe Biden says if Obama is elected, “It will not be six months before the world tests Barack Obama,” and “we’re gonna have an international crisis.” Biden has also said Obama was too inexperienced to
be president, and that “The presidency is not something that lends itself to on-the- job-training.”

Why vote for Obama when his own running mate guarantees the result will provoke a major crisis?  Vote for McCain, a man who will NOT be tested because nobody will doubt his resolve.

Meanwhile, we have won the Iraq war and our troops will come home victoriously. If Obama had been president, with a few more Democrats like Gerry Connolly and Warner, we would have surrendered Iraq last year, putting the Middle East in turmoil, Iraq in the hands of Iran, and oil prices probably over $200 a barrel. McCain’s “surge” strategy won the war; Obama’s strategy was a failure born of inexperience.

Four: Out-of-control government spending.

Republican-controlled Prince William had a manageable shortfall this year. Connolly-run, Democrat-controlled Fairfax has a $430 million shortfall. Since Democrats took over the state Senate, Virginia has a $2.7 billion shortfall, even after Democrat Mark Warner raised taxes by billions of dollars just a few years ago (after promising not to). McCain is a deficit hawk, while Obama wants to give $800 billion dollars to other countries to “fight global poverty.”

Five: Socialism — Democrats want to give your money to other people.

Our country was founded by people who believed in personal responsibility. But Democrats like Obama believe in “spreading the wealth.” This means taking money from people like you, who work for a
living, and redistributing it to others. Republicans want to spread opportunity, so that you can make yourself wealthy. We need to encourage people to build businesses and employ people, not
discourage them by taking their money away.

Electing McCain, Gilmore, Fimian and Wolf won’t change the balance of power in Washington.  Democrats will still control Congress, but they will be forced to work with Republicans. As bad as things
have been the last two years with Democrats in charge, we shouldn’t give them larger majorities or the White House.

A divided government would be better than government run by Democrats. McCain has proven his bipartisanship, and can bring different ideas to the table and force the Democrats in Congress to work for
all Americans, not just their liberal base. Bringing both sides to the table means a more serious consideration of everyone’s point of view.

Charles Reichley has been a Prince William County resident since 1981. He can be reached at critically .

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( RonCharest ) on October 23, 2008 at 4:21 pm

Thank You, QuestionAuthority;

Your post pretty much rebuts Mr. Reichley’s nonsense.

Mr. Reichley,

While I have always disagreed with you, I did think that of the three wingnuts who write columns for this newspaper - yourself, Simpson, and Concannon (now thankfully disappeared) - I always believed you were the most reputable.

With this post, you have officially jumped the shark.  I think you’re way too intelligent to believe such nonsense as claiming that oil prices dropped immediately because Congress lifted the ban on drilling in environmentally sensitive off shore areas.

Or that the stock market suddenly crashed due to the Democrats winning control of both houses of Congress.  Or that Democrats are the party of “Socialists” (what ever that means anymore) when it was the Republican administration who is now buying up equity stakes in all our major banks and corporations.  Not to mention, it is the Republican Administration who is keeping the terms of those equity purchase contracts secret.

Mr. Reichley, shame on you.  You have now become the fool that writers such as Simpson and Concannon have always been.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( phdee ) on October 23, 2008 at 4:01 pm

Oh throw GSU a towel.  What a whinny. Both presidentail candidates had a choice of the method of financing.  McCain made his choice, so did Obama.  So McCain made his usual “mistake in judgement”.

“Oh it’s crying time…“

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Godsaveus ) on October 23, 2008 at 1:26 pm

Equality 7-2521
The selection of Sarah Palin was excellent, she rocks the party , she unified the party. Although without the same success to gather supporters , given the economic situation Romney could be a better choice even for President.  Romney- Palin invincible.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( phdee ) on October 23, 2008 at 1:19 pm

Here is a free PN subscriber paid Republicn political add for the Republican scumbags running for office, posted bu a toad and bigoted die-hard Republic and fan of a church that worships statues of male and female genitalia, getting paid by PN, to spread a lot of convoluted plugs. note: old Charley stsays from bvushy wushy, doesn’t he? Just tries to blamew everything on clinton and the Dems. If gas is $4, it’s the Dems fault; if it goes to $3 the net day, it is because of Repubs.

As reichley describes events - oh yes - it’s only for the past 2 years, not 8, I must have been like Rip Van Winkle - asleep. Reichley was just napping; he always awoke when the Dems caused something or good news surfaced, i.e praise the repuyb.  Perhaps he was on drugs with Cindy McCain.

You have to really feel sorry for such a bigot and stupid person as Reichley.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Equality 7-2521 ) on October 23, 2008 at 10:27 am

Godsaveus, I, in turn, have to disagree with you.  Yes, McCain has limited resources, eight years of Bush Jr., and I’ll even give you media bias in favor of Obama (even though I don’t think that one is entirely accurate).  But all of this has nothing to do with how McCain has managed his campaign.  He’s jumped from strategy to strategy trying to make something stick; he’s had at least three changes at the top of his campaign committee; and he could have made a better VP choice (really, that couldn’t have been his idea).

As I said before, McCain is a great man, but he hasn’t had it all together during this campaign.  What happened to the real Maverick who told it like it was even when it wasn’t popular to do so.  The guy who stuck to the issues and called out Bush Jr. when he didn’t?  I may have voted for that McCain, but the guy on the GOP campaign trail right now ain’t him.

Mmarin, thanks.  I’m not a fan of our two-party system either, but you have to work with what you got, I guess.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( QuestionAuthority ) on October 23, 2008 at 9:39 am

Why you should vote Democratic

One: The economy
The Republicans inherited a budget surplus in 2000 and quickly ran up the largest debt in US history…larger than all former administrations since George Washington…combined…before the bailout! We now owe something like $11 Trillion dollars to countries like China and Saudi Arabia.

Two: Oil prices
The US uses 25% of the world’s energy. During their time in power they have done nothing to reduce our dependency on oil…nothing. Our fuel efficiency standards are the worst in the world, and when California tried to create incentives for auto manufacturers to supply electric emissions-free vehicles, the Republican leaders sued them! The Republican’s solution to high oil is not to reduce our dependency on oil, but to “Drill baby drill”

Three: National Security
Under Republican leadership we have grown less safe than we were before. Security experts agree that our unnecessary war and occupation of Iraq has been Al Qaeda’s best recruiting tool ever! Our policies on torture have enraged and alienated the world. Our military is exhausted and over-extended, our economy is weak, our reputation is shot by our “gunslinger at the OK corral” attitude, our gross incompetence in governing post-invasion Iraq. Republicans love to wave the flag and talk tough, but they have undercut our security.

Four: Out-of-control government spending
Republicans inherited a budget surplus and in less than a decade ran up the largest debt in US history…larger than all previous administrations combined! Ask them where that $9 billion dollars in $100 bills that they loaded on pallets and flew to Iraq went? They have no idea…they just lost $9 billion dollars. Their tax cuts and subsidies for big oil have resulted in Exxon posting obscene profit records, year after year while you struggled with $50 fill-ups at the pumps. Not only have they spent more money than all previous administrations, they’ve grown the size of government!

Five: Socialism
The Republican administration has just perpetrated the largest single act of socialism in my lifetime, the Wall Street bailout! And after handing Wall Street BILLIONS of dollars in bailout money, Wall Street execs went on a $440,000 luxury retreat! And I’m sorry, but what on earth do you call giving the middle class a $50 tax break while giving the top 1% in this country BILLIONS in tax breaks and then funding it all by borrowing money from China and Saudi Arabia that you and your children will have to pay back with interest! The Republican leadership in this country has spent a decade taking from the middle class and giving it to the rich in huge tax breaks! And “the Maverick” wants more of the same. Hello!! Any rational Republicans left on the planet?

We cannot afford another four years of the worst leadership we’ve ever had!

Enough!

Join with common-sense Republicans and independents who want real change and opportunity for the future…vote Democratic…Obama, Warner, Connolly in ‘08!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( mmarin ) on October 23, 2008 at 9:33 am

Equality 7-2521,

First off.  Love the name.  I’m a fan of Rynd as well. 

It sickens me that our choices are a democrat and a socialist.  If this nation really wanted change - Dr. Ron Paul would’ve been the correct choice.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Godsaveus ) on October 23, 2008 at 8:24 am

<And as for electing McCain, I’m not sure I want someone who can’t even manage his own campaign running our country.  McCain is a great man, no doubt, but he’s not right for our country at this moment in time.>
Equality 7-2521
I have to disagree with you. McCain with a limited resource is doing a brilliant campaign, Obama is spending almost tree times more than McCain , beside that McCain has to fight the media bias in favor of Obama, eight years with Bush and more. If Obama is going to manage the country spending in the way he does, no budget will be big enough for him.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( Equality 7-2521 ) on October 23, 2008 at 6:19 am

Hilarious.  Yes it’s all the fault of the Democrats.  Reichley, you sound as ridiculous as James Carville blaming everything on the Republicans. 

And as for electing McCain, I’m not sure I want someone who can’t even manage his own campaign running our country.  McCain is a great man, no doubt, but he’s not right for our country at this moment in time.

Now, can someone please tell me who I need to call so I can stop getting these stupid Obama-is-the-devil flyers from the Virginia GOP.  Really.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement