Abortions will go up with Obama
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
Del. Robert Marshall
Published: October 18, 2008
Third graders in Virginia are taught that a human life begins with the union of sperm and egg, yet Sen. Barack Obama stated at Saddleback Church in California this past August that the question of when
life begins was “above his pay grade.”
And Obama wants to be leader of the free world? His policies clearly will increase legal abortions if he is elected president.
Barack Obama told Planned Parenthood that the first thing he wants to do as president is sign the “Freedom of Choice Act” which will end all restrictions on abortion, including laws requiring parental or
informed consent, peaceful clinic demonstrations, conscience clauses for medical personnel opposed to abortion and bans on public funding for elective abortion.
Obama voted against legislation that would have provided medical care for babies born alive who survived a late term abortion. The New York Sun reported on Aug. 18 that Obama mischaracterized his
vote on that bill, as his campaign later acknowledged.
Barack Obama supports partial birth abortion, which crushes the skull and evacuates the brains of living children while they are in the birth process.
He voted “no” on a 2006 law that prohibited taking a minor across a state line for an abortion to avoid parental notice.
Sen. John McCain opposes legal abortion after conception. His running mate, Gov. Sarah Palin agrees. She champions the rights of special needs children like her Downs Syndrome son and autistic
children. Unlike Sen. Obama, Gov. Palin does not think the circumstances of one’s conception should be a death warrant for a child.
“I’ve got two daughters,” Obama said in Johnstown, Pennsylvania this year. “If they make a mistake, I don’t want them punished with a baby.”
Obama’s fervid support for abortion even after birth offers us an insight into the character of the man making decisions.
Is this the man you want to have his finger on the nuclear trigger or deal with foreign tyrants?
Is this the man you will trust with our wealth, our daughters, our sons, our future and our democratic institutions?
Del. ROBERT MARSHALL
13th District
Virginia House of Delegates
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( blue_doggette ) on October 22, 2008 at 3:02 pm
It sounds like more than one person needs to be more respectful.
It seems like the main theme of this thread has been lost. I don’t guess it bothers anyone else that Mr. Marshall feels he is in a better position to make deeply personal decisions for women than the woman herself?
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( anonmom ) on October 22, 2008 at 1:15 pm
You are arguing with your own words, phdee, so I’m sorry if I cannot answer for them. In case you forgot, YOU said:
“I also assume that the parents of an “anchor baby” had no “real human love” - but were just breeding to hopefully get to stay in the US. It’s like breeding regularly to get tax exemptions and to make the church, a business, grow.”
Please stop asking me to answer for your own thoughts. I have no idea what goes on inside your head.
Please try to calm down and to be more respectful of others here. I know it is a very frustrating forum for you. Take care.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( phdee ) on October 22, 2008 at 11:58 am
monmom” you still won’t admit you broughtmup “anchor baby”.
Do you deny that the derogatory and slur phrase “anchor baby” is usedmby racists to define a baby born in the US, who automatically gets US citizens, but its parentmare illegals? Do you deny that the racist allegations are that the parents of the baby aremaccused of using the baby as a means hopefully to remain in the US? If you deny these points, then you’re hopeless - plese go to Wikipedia for a definition.
You also used the phrase “real human love”. But inferred that that can onluy occur for citizens, i.e. since illegals are not human beings in your eyes.
Do you deny some folks breed to get taxmexemptions?
And do you agree churches, as businesses, have to “grow”, i.e they need “new blood”, so breed away.
There isn’t one thing wrong with my post. You’ve just got problems mentally.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( anonmom ) on October 22, 2008 at 7:37 am
phdee, I see that you keep going further and further into the gutter, as you apparently have nothing of substance left to say. “Racist pig” and “white trash” are hardly terms that would help win someone over to whatever your point of view is. You’ve been ranting so much I seem to have forgotten what that was, exactly.
And please remember that these were YOUR words:
“ I also assume that the parents of an “anchor baby” had no “real human love” - but were just breeding to hopefully get to stay in the US. It’s like breeding regularly to get tax exemptions and to make the church, a business, grow.“
Offensive on SO many levels. Keep it up, you’re doing a FANTASTIC job showing us what the left is all about.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( phdee ) on October 21, 2008 at 10:51 pm
anonmom: I"ll repeat: If you didn’t want to discuss “anchor babies”, then YOU should not have brought it up. But no, as a racist pig and anti-immigrationist, you had to get your hateful slurs in. You have worked yourseelf up into a frenzy with your hate and despite of hispanics, and now you try to play a role of someone so kin, so human, etc. You are a phony and hypocrit.
Why not do a search of “anchor baby” on google, and see for yourself, under Wikipedia, what it says. And then tell me I am wrong. You haven’t the courage or strength to do so, Ms. hypocrit and Ms. racist. And whikle there, search for “white trash” also. You need some educating.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( anonmom ) on October 21, 2008 at 9:06 pm
You need to stop and take a breath, because now you seem seriously confused, and your silly little rants are getting more and more childish. I don’t think you even pay attention to the topic at hand anymore. You’re soundng more and more like annoying background noise. Go to bed now and let the grownups talk without your silly interruptions.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( phdee ) on October 21, 2008 at 6:23 pm
anonmom: It was you who brought up “anchor baby”, not me. You should not bring up matters you are so shocked by.
I told you I don’t use the term, that it is racist, derogatoiry, and a slur. However, it is used all the time by racists like yourself to describe babies born in the US to illegal hispanic immigrants, in a racist and derogatory manner - intentionally. It appears you, like McCain trying to distant himself from Bush, are now trying like a die-hard Republican to distant yourself from the term by feigning shock, disbelief, etc., and pretending I don’t know it is racist. You need to increase you Paxil dosage. I’m curious how my discussion was in any way incorrect, and how would one discuss it since you faint and swoon. “Real love” was your phrase also. You are really pathetic.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( anonmom ) on October 21, 2008 at 8:24 am
“I also assume that the parents of an “anchor baby” had no “real human love” - but were just breeding to hopefully get to stay in the US. It’s like breeding regularly to get tax exemptions and to make the church, a business, grow.“
phdee, I cannot imagine a more disgustingly racist and inhumane statement, even coming from you. You’ll say anything to get attention, won’t you? Again, why are you so needy here that you have to dog everyone and do everything to hinder intelligent discussion? I think I have an idea why.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( phdee ) on October 21, 2008 at 1:28 am
A human is a placental mammal, of the order Primates.
Breeding is done by mammals, call it sex, mating, sexual intercourse, or whatever.
Some folks would never be able to make it through a biology or anatomy course.
Blue_doggett, I did fail to mention the wife was in the decision making process. As I recall it, she was the one who wanted to remove the “tubes”. This is where the fascist pig, Marshall, got involved at the request of his “constituents”. I essence, Marshall raped the marriage vows of “til death do us part”. The wife was the sole person who had the authority to make the life or death decision,ot the constituents, Marshall, the church, or the govt. Like Palin, it was a abuse of authority by Marshall.
As for k.o., I fail to see how the Finn case has anything to do with abortion (the man was not pregnant nor asking for an abortiom), illegal aliens (were any present - these were US citizens), Democrats (there was no election upcoming) - just an ignorant statement. Marshall should have just minded his own business, as should his constituents.
This just shows how some people - constituents - think they have the right to meddle in other people’s affairs - just get an ignorant congressman to step in. Just fascist pigs - like Nazis. These people are extremely dangerous to society and our freedoms.
ANONMOM: if you want to use the term “anchor baby”, go ahead. Just keep in mind I don’t use it, that the term is considered derogatoruy and racist (check the internet if in doubt), it is a slur. etc. It also has been applied to legal immigrants, especially hispanic. I know you have been on Paxi and are having mental and emotional problems, and are filled with hate, irrational behavior, and hear noises, so I understand where your racism comes from. I also assume that the parents of an “anchor baby” had no “real human love” - but were just breeding to hopefully get to stay in the US. It’s like breeding regularly to get tax exemptions and to make the church, a business, grow.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( blue_doggette ) on October 20, 2008 at 8:32 pm
All mammals breed. Please lets not start talking about horses and dogs making love. PLEASE!
Report Inappropriate Comment