An issue with the lies of Barack Obama
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
Chris Royse
Published: October 6, 2008
While I am not surprised when I hear Barack Obama continually say he will meet with terrorist “potentates” around the world without “precondition,” an approach no one should be
surprised by given his documented connections to the terrorist Bill Ayers and the radical anti-American commentator Rev. Jeremiah A. Wright Jr., it is the lying and backtracking by
him I personally take the most concern with.
Though his past associations with Ayers, the founder of the domestic terrorist organization the Weather Underground, and his past attendance of the radical anti-patriotic preaching
of Wright are well documented, when brought to light he immediately denies his associations and makes counter accusations. Barack Obama has demonstrated a lack of judgment
in those whom he has chosen to associate with during his rise to the top of the Democratic Party ticket, and during the first presidential debate he showed a lack of sincerity for our
troops by obviously not having a clue as to the name of the soldier he wore on his wrist. He also displayed a lack of maturity and respect by continually rolling his eyes at the
answers provided by John McCain.
Now is the time for America to elect a man who associated with Ronald Reagan on his rise to the top, who sincerely cares for our soldiers because we cared for him when he
defended us and has the maturity and experience to lead us to victory on all fronts. Now is the time for America to vote for John McCain for president.
CHRIS ROYSE
Woodbridge
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( phdee ) on October 09, 2008 at 11:13 am
Sort of reminds us here in PWC of the fraud allegation by Republican Jeff Frederick about fraud by Dems in voter registration, huh?
As more and more people register to vote to mget rid of Bush- McCain-Palin, the more squeels by the Republicans there are of fraud. They just don’t want people to vote.
Shows desperation.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Godsaveus ) on October 08, 2008 at 11:52 am
Nevada state authorities seized records and computers Tuesday from the Las Vegas office of ACORN organization tied to Barack Obama that tries to get low-income people registered to vote, after fielding complaints of voter fraud.
Bob Walsh, spokesman for the Nevada secretary of state’s office, told FOXNews.com the raid was prompted by ongoing complaints about “erroneous” registration information being submitted by the Association of Community Organizations for Reform Now, also called ACORN. For wich Obama work has Lawyer community organizer.
So along with the reservoir of political support that came to Obama through his close ties with Jeremiah Wright, Father Michael Pfleger, and other Chicago black churches, Chicago Acorn appears to have played a major role in Obama’s political advance. Sure enough, a bit of digging into Obama’s years in the Illinois State Senate indicates strong concern with Acorn’s signature issues, as well as meetings with Acorn and the introduction by Obama of Acorn-friendly legislation on the living wage and banking practices. You begin to wonder whether, in his Springfield days, Obama might have best been characterized as “the Senator from Acorn.”
In 2006, ACORN also committed what Washington Secretary of State Sam Reed called the “worse case of election fraud” in the state’s history.
In the case, ACORN submitted just over 1,800 new voter registration forms, and all but six of the 1,800 names were fake.
More recently, 27,000 registrations handled by the group from January to July 2008 “went into limbo because they were incomplete, inaccurate, or fraudulent,“ said James Terry, chief public advocate at the Consumers Rights League.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( raywilliams ) on October 07, 2008 at 4:13 pm
You are right GSU. We should focus on the candidates - as in the McCain Economic Plan is the same as the Bush Economic Plan: Provide tax relief for the rich, give tax breaks to Big Oil, show some trickle-down to the middle class - actually low-class as these are people earning under $250,000 per year. Install a tax on their health care programs and continue the $10 billion expense in Iraq by continuing to borrow money from China.
Well, it didn’t work for President XXXX and I doubt that it will work under John McCain.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( Godsaveus ) on October 07, 2008 at 1:52 pm
Not Bush, Clinton nor Carter are running this time , so please focus on the candidates. The media bias and the elite of the Democratic party want to hide the other side of Barry Obama. His “alliances” that they all have something in common. United States is a bad country and we must be shame of our country. He never knew about his Reverend , after 20 years. He never knew about his terrorist friend because he commit his crimes when he was 8 years old. Probably he never knew about Tony Rezco and his ties with the Chicago mob, the one that give a little favor to Obama in order to buy his house, and Michelle his wife (now hiding in the closet) who never was proud of her country until now that Barry is running for president. Obama start his political life has a community organizer and he is in part responsible for the house crisis. He and his ties with the radical organization ACORN that promote mortgage loans to people that can not afford are well known.
http://article.nationalreview.com/?q=NDZiMjkwMDczZWI5ODdjOWYxZTIzZGIyNzEyMjE0ODI
Obama strategist David Axelrod said this to Ben Smith over at Politico:
Bill Ayers lives in his neighborhood. Their kids attend the same school. They’re certainly friendly, they know each to other, as anyone whose kids go to school together Ayers’ son Malik is roughly (27), his son Zayd is three years older, and Rhodes Scholar Chesa Boudin, Ayers and wife Bernadine Dohrn’s foster son, is also roughly about that. Meanwhile, Obama’s daughters Sasha and Malia are 6 and 9, respectively. MORE LIES
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( pwanon ) on October 07, 2008 at 11:11 am
Yes, phdee, your eloquence may have us there. But wait…let’s just see what the lawyer who was in charge of the investigation into the Keating scandal had to say about it:
“First, I should tell your listeners I’m a registered Democrat, so I’m not on (McCain’s) side of a lot of issues. But I investigated John McCain for a year and a half, at least, when I was special counsel to the Senate Ethics Committee in the Keating Five. ... And if there is one thing I am absolutely confident of, it is John McCain is an honest man. I recommended to the Senate Ethics Committee that he be cut out of the case, that there was no evidence against him.“
Where else have we seen this lawyer in action?...Hmmm…defending Billy Jeff Clinton during his, shall we say, “troubles” with a certain intern.
I’ll take his word for it that John McCain is an honest man over a youtube clip from BHO’s website.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( raywilliams ) on October 07, 2008 at 11:09 am
It’s over pwanon because I don’t debate with rocks.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( phdee ) on October 07, 2008 at 11:04 am
Has anyone seen today’s youtube (it’s on Obama’s website) about the Keating 5 crooks, one of which ws McCain. The Seenate investigation said he used poor judgement. Keating was sent to the pen. McCain and the other 4 Senators (democrates) should also have been.
That Savings and Loan disaster cost tghe US taxpayers BILLIONS of dollars. McCain took payoffs of about $112,000 from Keating, lavish trips to the bahamas in K’s jet, with family, kidzs, and the babysitter (like who takes care of Palin’s kids). S&L;‘s failed like flies. McCain was big on deregulation in the matter. It was corruption at its best for McCain. And this is later 1980 to early 1990’s.
Yes sir. MCcAIN’S RECORD: WHOREMONGER, FAMILY DESERTER. BRIBE RECIPIENT, CROOK, THIEF, LIAR, POOR JUDGEMENT, PEN MATERIAL. A real leader!!!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( scorpio ) on October 07, 2008 at 11:03 am
One more thing: We heard the media almost referring to Hillary as the next president until they realized Americans are not quite excited to see the Clintons back in the White House which they once turned into a playboy mansion and robbed empty on their way out. The point is - do not believe polls and how much Obama leads ahead of McCain. The media wants to tell the masses to vote for the winners they would like to see prevail etc… We heard how much Al Gore was leading, then John Kerry was certainly the next president… until we heard that gasp: “Who are those value voters”?! So let us prove the liberal media once again wrong! Let’s go and vote again for life, for family, for our principles and our moral values!
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( pwanon ) on October 07, 2008 at 10:04 am
It’s over, huh? Because you put your fingers in your ears and refuse to believe Bill Clinton himself? Or the Washington Post? This detachment from reality is such a uniquely liberal invention…
I would attempt to tie Barack to some policies, but he’s never made any to speak of. I would attempt to understand this “Change We Need” that he speaks of, but I can’t find any evidence of anything he’s ever reformed. I’d like to believe him when he blames Bush for this crisis…but it’s hard to hear him when he’s speaking from behind a pile of $126K of F & F money, while standing next to Chris Dodd, Barney Frank, and Bill Clinton.
John McCain is not George Bush. George Bush is not running. Keep using your 90% figure to explain why, amazingly, members of the same party usually vote together. And how many times has BHO stepped away from the Democrats, and their brilliant run of the past two years? I would presume, roughly, never.
Now off you go, Ray. I’m sure there’s a dictator, bully, or threatening old woman somewhere nearby that the Democratic Party is organizing an unconditional surrender to. You wouldn’t want to be late.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( raywilliams ) on October 07, 2008 at 9:50 am
And now pwanon, please put your crayons down and try to absorb this.
President Bush has been president for nearly eight years. If - and I say if -there was something wrong with Clinton Administration policy, it is the duty of the current administration to review policies, project the financial impacts to our nation (understanding MBA-holding Bush would have advisors to ‘splain this to him) and take remedial action to return our nation to a proper fiscal direction.
If the problem was caused by Clinton policy, why did Bush not correct the course of the nation before the financial meltdown? Bush held the House and Senate for 6 years - long enough to take corrective action if necessary.
President Bush failed because he either didn’t understand, didn’t care or believed the Clinton Policy was the right policy.
I understand you don’t like Obama. I’m okay with that. I understand your concerns with the Bush-McCain relationship and how the public associates McCain with the failed Bush administration. But it is truly comical to watch you guys try to blame Clinton when he’s been out of office for EIGHT YEARS! Then try to tie McCain to Reagan from 20 years ago!!
But no, Bush is responsible for what happens on his watch. McCain supported Bush, which makes McCain responsible for what happened on his watch. They are tied together by policy and McCain will need to campaign on this relationship.
Your position is understandable. McCain is running from Bush every chance he gets. You SHOULD support his track skills as he is your candidate.
As Barack is my candidate, I’m going to make sure McCain stays in his lane and jumps every hurdle in this 800 meter dash to November 4th.
Our tit for tat is over. You may resume playing with your crayons.
Report Inappropriate Comment