Transportation planning in the state of Virginia

Paul F. Nichols
Published: June 20, 2008

The Special Legislative Session called by Gov. Tim Kaine to deal with the commonwealth’s transportation problems begins on June 23. There have been many proposals to fix transportation: The governor
has proposed a plan that increases several taxes. The House Republicans have proposed a plan that increases 15 taxes and fees.  Citizens have contacted me with suggestions to take money from other
state programs such as education or to raise the fuel tax five cents. I plan to look at all suggestions, but most of all listen to the constituents of the 51st House District who spend two to four hours each
day getting to and from work. 

It is clear that action must be taken by the General Assembly to provide a long-term solution to our crisis. Taking no action, as some propose, is not acceptable as our daily commute becomes worse
each day, each week, each month, each year. Numerous projects in Prince William County have been delayed or cancelled due to the lack of transportation funds: the Route. 123/Route. 1 overpass; the
widening of the Prince William County Parkway from Old Bridge to Hoadly, to name a few.

Two years ago the General Assembly passed and the governor signed legislation that created enhanced fines for traffic violations.  The funds from these enhanced penalties would have gone into
transportation projects. These penalties only applied to Virginia drivers. Out of state drivers, who make up a significant portion of miles traveled in Virginia, got a free ride. Fortunately, this legislation was
reversed during the 2008 session. In the upcoming special session, we should look closely at capturing revenue from out-of-state drivers who use our roadways.

Northern Virginia and Hampton Roads are the economic engines of Virginia. While traffic is not a concern in most of the rural areas of the state, the financial benefit those areas receive from Northern
Virginia and Hampton Roads is substantial, making this a statewide issue that needs a statewide solution rather than just increasing revenue regionally.

Although I continue to believe that the long-term solution to our traffic mess continues to be metro and light rail to Woodbridge, I do believe that action must be taken now to work toward maintaining and
improving our roads.

I hope to hear from many more of my constituents during the coming days as the General Assembly deals with a seemingly intractable problem.

PAUL F. NICHOLS

Delegate 51st District