Writer is worried for United States
Advertisement
Text size: small | medium | large
A. Vic Poillucci
Published: October 18, 2008
During the second presidential debate, and at other times during his remarks to the voting public, Sen. Barack Obama has intimated that his mother struggled to raise him and used food stamps in her
attempt to provide sustenance. If that statement is true one has to ask the question — where did Barry get his money?
In 1979, Barry attended Occidental College in California and had two roommates, Muhammad Hasan Chandoo and Wahid Hamid, both from Pakistan. In the summer of 1981, he made a round-the-world
trip stopping to see his mother in Indonesia, then on to Hyderabad, India, three weeks in Karachi, Pakistan, where he stayed with his roommate’s family, then off to Africa to visit his father’s family. Where
did he get the money?
When he finished his travel it was off to Columbia University where he changed his name to Barack. Where did he get the tuition money? After Columbia, he went to Chicago to work as a community
organizer for $12,000 a year. By happenstance he met Antoin “Tony” Rezko, born in Aleppo, Syria. Rezko has been convicted of fraud and bribery. As a matter of interest, Rezko was
named “Entrepreneur of the Decade” by the Arab-American Business and Professional Association. Approximately two years later Obama entered Harvard Law School. Where did he get the money?
In 2005, Obama purchased a new home in the Kenwood district of Chicago for $1.65 million. Where did he get the money? Now Barry (Barack) is running for president. Only in America, you say!
As a matter for the record —
Valerie Jarrett was Michelle Obama’s boss; she is now Obama’s chief advisor. Where was Jarrett born? Shiraz, Iran. Oh, by the way — the college roommates that were born in Pakistan? They are in
charge of the Internet campaign contributions. Where is that money coming from?
On Sept. 7, the Washington Times posted a verbal slip that was made on “This Week” narrated by George Stephanopoulos. Obama when referring to his religion, said “my Muslim faith.” When
questioned, his response? He made a mistake. Some mistake.
Final point from the book “Audacity of Hope” — his words, not mine — “I will stand with the Muslims should the political winds shift in an ugly direction.” Is there a pattern here?
A. VIC POILLUCCI
Woodbridge
Post a Comment
The commenting period has ended or commenting has been deactivated for this article.
Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:
Reader Reactions
Posted by ( phdee ) on October 21, 2008 at 8:18 am
pwanon: I think you are trying to twist my point aboutmSpitzer and Edwards. My point was that the country under Repubs is so wrapped up in sex. Spitzer was prosecuting and going after crooks in NY. He was banging some woman.
Question: which would you rather have? Spitzer banding some woman, OR him prosecuting financial crooks which might have played a role in preventing the financial meltdown? I say let him bang away. Just about everyhone, especially Repubs, is doing it anyway.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( pwanon ) on October 19, 2008 at 8:03 pm
“If their behavior is the example you want to set for your children”
Setting an example for children. Great. Let’s talk about that.
BHO took his children, each and every Sunday, to a church where a man as vile as any to ever stand behind the pulpit cursed all white people, cursed America, and said that the 3,000 innocent people killed on 9/11 deserved what they got.
Excellent parenting there. Nothing like teaching your kids that intolerance and prejudice are a virtue.
And because I don’t feel like going over to your other post to shoot you down, I’ll respond to your latest pile of slop regarding Ayers here.
You state that because he was never convicted, his guilt CAN be questioned.
Um, since he’s said, in multiple published interviews, that
A: He’s guilty; and
B: He’s afraid he didn’t bomb enough
I would assume that his guilt is not exactly in question.
If you think it is, you actually are thicker upstairs than I thought.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( raywilliams ) on October 19, 2008 at 7:26 pm
“Classy, Ray. I didn’t know that you knew Cindy McCain. Or her personal sexual history that would allow intimate enough knowledge to call her a tramp.“
John’s history of chasing Cindy around the country like a teenager sowing his wild oats is well documented in the press and in John’s own book.
Yes, I would consider a woman that freely gives herself to a married man a tramp - and as phdee correctly notes - the first word I chose was not allowed in this family paper.
When selecting a presidential candidate, we must look at their full history. You like to make an issue of Bill Ayers for example.
Well being aquainted with someone is way different than being the stud in question cheating on your wife and the tramp - and I spell that with a capital “W” - who gave away the goodies.
If their behavior is the example you want to set for your children, or perhaps even your wife, then go forth and vote for infidelity on November 4th.
I would just suggest Todd Palin hang close to Sarah should their ticket win.
Who knows how John would act as “the most powerful man in the world”.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( pwanon ) on October 19, 2008 at 6:27 pm
“Take the financial mess of Bush’s making: there are two politicians caught up un some sort of sex scandal, Spitzer of NY and Edwards of”
So your contention is that had these two men not been nailing women other than their wife, they’d have been able to prevent the entire subprime mess that was engineered by Billy Jeff Clinton’s administration?
Wow. Brilliant.
As for everything else you write…honestly, you’re not even coherent enough to argue with. I can’t even figure out what you’re trying to say, between mispelled words and sentence fragments. So just make sure you do a better job when typing…you know, when they don’t keep you in the padded room wearing the jacket that has no sleeves.
And by the way…I think it’s hilarious that all of you enlightened, open-minded liberals refer to Sarah Palin and Cindy McCain as tramps, and sl*ts, and wh*res, simply because they’re opinionated, successful women. But at the same time, if anyone even dared to breathe similar words about Michelle “I just recently discovered that America is okay” Obama, you would explode with indignation and cry racism with all your eggheaded might (which isn’t much.)
The height of hypocrisy, there.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( rain3fly ) on October 19, 2008 at 4:27 pm
An old English Teacher trick to catch students who plagiarize: Copy any paragraph from Poilucci’s letter and Paste it onto Google search. What do you find? Whole parts, entire sentences, full phrases copied (plagiarized) verbatim from the rumor websites that spread this false garbage. The editors of this newspaper could have done the same simple research. It takes a minute or two…
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( phdee ) on October 19, 2008 at 3:41 pm
pwanon: You Repubs are so big into sex. If having an affaqir is a trait of a great leader, like Clinton, then I say let’s go for it.
Take the financial mess of Bush’s making: there are two politicians caught up un some sort of sex scandal, Spitzer of NY and Edwards of NC. Both were active in trying to prevent this financial mess long before it occurrred. Spitzer was taking many of the Wall St. crooks and financial institutions to court. But he had to resign over the sex scandal. Which goes to show that the Repubs are more interested in sex that someone saving the US financial system.
Ray probably could not use the more appropriate words “w****e” or “***t” for Mccain’s wife because this board will allege “term violations” and not post. Substitute prostitute and it will get through”.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( pwanon ) on October 19, 2008 at 1:31 pm
“and family and took up with a rich tramp”
Classy, Ray. I didn’t know that you knew Cindy McCain. Or her personal sexual history that would allow intimate enough knowledge to call her a tramp.
But hey, if anyone would know about tramps it would be liberals…who twice elected Dress Stainer in Chief Billy Jeff Clinton.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( jm6811 ) on October 19, 2008 at 9:54 am
Poillucci, you are the only one who believe all this lies about Obama and you want us to do the same? sorry buddy, we are not that stupid. before someone gets nominated to be president of the greatest nation on earth all his background has to be checked. obviously Barack Obama’s passed all the scrutiny, otherwise he wouldn’t be running for president.
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( rain3fly ) on October 19, 2008 at 9:23 am
Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice, shame on me. But print a lie twice in a newspaper, shame on the editor. And shame on any of you that take this lie (check it out!—it’s another false internet rumor designed to catch fools!) for face value and try to answer it. It’s a LIE! Can any of us spell L-I-E ?? Is there anything about the concept of LIE that we can’t understand? The issue, here, folks, is that Poillucci wrote a deliberate lie and the newspaper printed it without hesitation. Does that bother you?
Report Inappropriate Comment
Posted by ( raywilliams ) on October 19, 2008 at 9:09 am
Well, we know where John McCain got his money. He dumped his wife and family and took up with a rich tramp.
I guess that is the Republican Family Value we are asked to support.
Report Inappropriate Comment