American Civil Liberties threatens to sue Botetourt County

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

By Abe Nelson

Published: March 24, 2008

The American Civil Liberties Union of Virginia is threatening legal action against Botetourt County if county officials don’t repeal an ordinance restricting campaign signs.

Provisions in the Botetourt ordinance are similar, in some ways, to provisions in an ordinance recently passed by the Manassas Park City Council.

Both ordinances restrict the time campaign signs can be placed on private property.

The Botetourt ordinance states that campaign signs cannot be posted 60 days before an election an must be removed within 15 days after the election.

Rebecca Glenberg, legal director ACLU of Virginia, said the time limit violates the free speech clause of the First Amendment.

The Manassas Park ordinance states that signs must be removed 14 days after the election, but makes no mention of how soon before elections the signs can be placed on private property.

Manassas Park City Attorney Dean Crowhurst said he doesn’t think the Manassas Park ordinance is similar enough to the Botetourt ordinance to be subject to legal action.

“The Botetourt ordinance has to do with the restriction on the amount of time prior to an election, they can have signs up,” Crowhurst said. “I looked at their ordinance and I did not see anything that would indicate that our ordinance would be unconstitutional.”

Crowhurst said there are “time, place and manner restrictions that — if they’re reasonable — can be placed on these signs.”

The “reasonable” restrictions apply to signs in placre after an election, Crowhurst said.

“I think as long as there are no restriction prior to an election, we’re okay,” Crowhurst said.

Glenberg said Manassas Park’s 14 day provision could be problematic.

“The basic principle is the same in that people should be allowed to engage in political speech on their own private property at any time that they choose,” Glenberg said.

The passing of time should not be cause for mandatory sign removal, since election results may not diminish someone’s desire to exercise their free speech, Glenberg said.

The ACLU of Virginia would have to study the Manassas Park ordinance before considering a lawsuit, Glenberg said.

Keith Walker can be reached at 703-369-6751.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( QuestionAuthority ) on March 25, 2008 at 8:07 am

The really irritating thing about this whole “US Constitution” thing is that you have to abide by all the amendments, not just the second.

Well, unless you’re the president. Or Vice President. Or National Security Agency. Or unless you’re a Telecom company assisting the NSA in illegal surveillance.

The CIA of course will need an exemption if they set up secret prisons in foreign countries. Oh, and I almost forgot Gitmo...we have to be able to torture and deny fundamental human rights, but that’s not technically the US, so we’re OK there.

Law enforcement will of course need to deny freedom of speech in areas surrounding political events (conventions, rallys, etc.) where someone might see or hear protesters.

OK, so let’s just say that we must always abide by the second amendment and then follow the others when it’s convenient.

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement