Partisan split emerges in Va. roads debate

Advertisement

Text size: small | medium | large

Associated Press
Published: June 25, 2008

RICHMOND (AP)—House Republican leaders will choose Wednesday whether Gov. Timothy M. Kaine's transportation funding bill dies in a showdown floor vote or takes a lethal detour to a committee famously hostile to tax

increases.

Partisan divides

became clearer Tuesday, the second day of the special legislative session Kaine called to consider methods to finance the state's ballooning highway and transit needs.

Two Republican bills that would have reserved royalties from offshore oil and gas leases to transportation died before a Democratic-dominated Senate committee.

In the GOP-dominated House, Democrats were unable to sidetrack Republican legislation requiring that private firms audit the Kaine administration's transportation agencies or another bill that would make aggressive use of highway tolls and public-private highway ventures in Hampton Roads.

Kaine's bill would yield about $1 billion a year. Nearly half would go to fund highway upkeep and repair statewide. Kaine has said he won't accept any bill that doesn't provide significant maintenance money.

Leaders of the House GOP majority have ruled out a general statewide tax increase and prefer restoring regional authorities to levy taxes that underwrite new highway projects to ease traffic gridlock in the state's most populous areas, Hampton Roads and northern

Virginia.

The House Rules Committee will determine whether Kaine's transportation legislation goes directly to the House floor or to the Finance Committee. It appears certain to die in either place.

"If they kill everything in the House tomorrow, they're making a terrible mistake,'' said Colgan, from Prince William, chairman of the Senate Finance Committee.

Besides the sharp and seemingly irreconcilable partisan differences, regional tensions emerged Tuesday over prospects that the state's formula for allocating transportation money could be altered, shifting more money to fast-growing urban and suburban areas.

Rural legislators fear that a proposed formula based on population could leave them with no cash to build new roads or fix old ones.

Saslaw, the Senate Democratic Leader from Fairfax, said no such measures would emerge from the Senate. But he can't assure Democratic and Republican senators from rural areas that similar efforts won't be attempted in the House.

Sen. William Wampler, R-Bristol, questioned Transportation Secretary Pierce Homer during a briefing to the Senate Finance Committee over whether Kaine would sign a law that directs more road funding to urban areas.

"For those of us in some parts of the commonwealth that don't maybe have as high a growth rate as others but still have very expensive transportation projects, it concerns us greatly when we see bills that are introduced that reallocates the funding formula,'' Wampler said.

Homer said legislators will have to settle how new construction funds are allocated, but added that Kaine would not accept a change in funding that diminishes the state's ability to maintain roads and bridges in rural

regions.

Democratic Sen. Roscoe Reynolds said that while the most critical needs for mass transit improvements are in congested urban areas, rural regions dependent solely on highways are in their own crisis with gasoline no longer affordable for some people.

"I live in an area where there's no such thing as mass transportation. You either have a car or truck, a bicycle or you walk,'' said Reynolds, of Henry County.

Reader Reactions

Posted by ( durward007 ) on June 26, 2008 at 9:19 am

Partisan split emerges?  Isn’t the partisan split why we are having this special session now?  The Republican and Democratic caucuses couldn’t come to agreement in regular session

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( willow703 ) on June 25, 2008 at 9:11 am

It is “politics as usual” in Richmond.
Democrats refuse to reserve to transportation use revenue from off-shore oil & gas leases. Off-shore oil & gas leases? Are these part of the famed 69 million acres enviro-nuts insist be drilled upon before any drilling is done in ANWR? And are they not “off-shore” where drilling is a cardinal sin?
Republicans want another audit of transportation related agencies. Will that reveal more than the dozen or so
audits done since 2002? Have the Republicans acted on the findings of any of those audits?
The Republicans want to repeat the “Albo fee” fiasco. Only those who fuel their vehicles in the Northern Virginia & Hampton Roads areas would pay for the construction & maintenance of the roads in those areas. The tens of millions commuting from outside those areas or just passing through and fueling elsewhere would have free use of the roads.
I live in an area with mass transportation. It will not take me from my home in Lorton to the commissary, exchange, hospital or other places on Fort Belvoir which are the destination of more than 90 percent of my trips.
I have been on a metro bus once & metro rail once in thirty years.
My tech smart son, a Democrat, tells me almost half of the bills submitted so far in this session are in no way related to transportation. He tells me many bills have been submitted in memory of or commendation of people & events.
It appears that our employees in the legislature will continue to fail to do the work required of them. Of course, we the employer will continue to pay them & extend their contracts.
And everyone goes home happy?

Report Inappropriate Comment

Posted by ( woodbridgeboy ) on June 25, 2008 at 7:24 am

I predict that the GOP will try and do everything possible to stop the Governor from building anymore roads and I also predict that nobody will vote for a Republican in Virginia again...Republicans were in-charge of the state for over ten years and they did nothing at all to improve our transportation network...oh wait, they did come up with HOT (Lexus) lanes so we can fill our tanks with $4.00 gas and then pay $30 for a one way ticket to work...yea that was a great idea!!!

Report Inappropriate Comment

Post a Comment

(Requires free registration)

  • Please avoid offensive, vulgar, or hateful language.
  • Respect others.
  • Use the "Report Inappropriate Comment" link when necessary.
  • See the Terms and Conditions for details.

Click here to post a comment.


Tags relating to this article:

  • No tags are associated with this article.

Can't find what you're looking for? Try our quick search:



Email This Print This AddThis Social Bookmark Button RSS Feed Add to My Yahoo!

Advertisement

Advertisement

Advertisement