Update: I-66 compromise draws wide swath of reaction - INSIDENOVA.COM: Arlington

Email Facebook Twitter iTunes

Update: I-66 compromise draws wide swath of reaction

Font Size:
Default font size
Larger font size

Posted: Thursday, February 11, 2016 7:30 am

Reaction has been mixed to the Feb. 10 news that the McAuliffe administration and leaders in the General Assembly have agreed to a framework proposal that would have a four-mile eastbound stretch of the highway from the Dulles Toll Road to Ballston widened sooner rather than later while retaining many of the other components the administration’s earlier plan that would bring toll lanes to the highway in 2017.

Arlington County Board Chairman Libby Garvey (D) said her government was “disappointed with the news” that widening – using $140 million in state-budget funds – would occur sooner rather than later.

But Fairfax County Board of Supervisors Chairman Sharon Bulova (D) said the compromise would “advance this critical project” by avoiding a showdown in the General Assembly.

“We thank Gov. McAuliffe for keeping this project moving forward,” Bulova said in a statement put out shortly after word of the compromise plan emerged.

Republicans and some Democrats in Richmond were working to kill the tolling proposal outright. Some of their measures already had been killed in committee, but others looked likely to find success – progress that forced McAuliffe to decide whether he should take a stance of confrontation or compromise.

He chose the latter.

Among those generally pleased with, if somewhat equivocal about, the decision was state Sen. Barbara Favola (D-31st), whose district runs from Arlington through northern Fairfax and into Loudoun County.

“I support the governor’s efforts to improve I-66 and provide relief to Northern Virginia commuters,” Favola said. “However, we need to ensure that the localities directly affected by widening I-66 are part of this conversation.

U.S. Rep. Don Beyer (D-8th) was more in the unhappy contingent, saying that the decision changes the longstanding understanding that I-66 would not be widened inside the Beltway.

“My initial reaction is one of concern,” Beyer said. “But I continue to learn details of the proposal and to listen to constituents on all sides of the issue.”

Environmental and transit groups largely were unhappy with developments.

Rules of Conduct

  • 1 Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
  • 2 Don't Threaten or Abuse. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated. AND PLEASE TURN OFF CAPS LOCK.
  • 3 Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
  • 4 Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
  • 5 Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
  • 6 Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.

Welcome to the discussion.

1 comment:

  • Dave Schutz posted at 7:08 pm on Thu, Feb 11, 2016.

    Dave Schutz Posts: 252

    I'm a big Libby Garvey fan. However, on this one, I think Ms Bulova has it right. We were going to lose the whole thing if the Governor tried to keep the original proposal, and the ability to toll will do a lot to keep traffic down and to provide a revenue stream for useful transit improvements. The rest of the state has formed an impression of Arlington as the dog in the manger, and we have to acquiesce to the changes which have occurred since we forced the deal with Secretary Coleman on 66 width.


Arlington, VA

Current Conditions

Scattered Clouds
Humidity: 70%
Winds: ESE at 3mph
Feels Like: 69°

Your Extended Forecast


High 87°/Low 64°
Mix of sun and clouds


High 88°/Low 69°
Times of sun and clouds


High 88°/Low 68°
Afternoon thunderstorms


High 87°/Low 66°