Tim McCormick.jpg

Tim McCormick holds up a child with a sign protesting data center development in Prince William County on Tuesday night. The county's Planning Commission on Wednesday held its first public hearing on the contentious PW Digital Gateway data center campus.

Click here for a full recap of Wednesday night/Thursday morning's Planning Commission meeting.

____________________________

Original story: Sept. 14, 8:01 p.m.

More than 230 people signed up to provide public comment Wednesday night on the proposed PW Digital Gateway for the county’s Planning Commission, setting up a hearing potentially lasting into Thursday’s workday.

The Planning Commission is holding the first public hearing on the controversial request to designate nearly 2,100 acres in western Prince William County for data centers.

When sign-up for the hearing started at 5:30 p.m., 88 people were already in line to put their name down. 

When the meeting started at 7 p.m., 183 people had signed up to speak in person on the project, and 53 were slated to provide virtual public comment. 

If each speaker takes their allotted three minutes, the hearing could last a minimum of 11 hours and 48 minutes, which would put the start of the Planning Commission discussion at past 7 a.m. Thursday. 

“I would like to ask all attendants that we conduct ourselves with the highest level of respect for each other,” Potomac Commissioner Juan McPhail said to kick-off the meeting.

The meeting would likely shatter any record of the the longest Prince William County government meeting. The latest end to a meeting in recent years was in February 2021, when a Board of County Supervisors meeting that started at 2 p.m. on Tuesday concluded at 4:30 a.m. Wednesday, primarily because of a hearing on the Dar-Al Noor Mosque expansion.

The PW Digital Gateway, which proposes 27.6 million square feet of data centers along Pageland Lane, has quickly become the most controversial and contentious local land-use proposal in decades. Opponents and proponents have launched personal attacks against each other, and it has spawned recall efforts against Gainesville Supervisor Pete Candland and Board Chair Ann Wheeler and a federal lawsuit against Candland.

The original application was submitted last summer by landowners along Pageland Lane who wanted to change the land designation on about 800 acres in the Comprehensive Plan for the project. The Board of County Supervisors later expanded the request to cover 2,100 acres

Supporters say the project will provide a huge economic boon to the county in an area that’s no longer rural. Opponents say such large developments would decimate the character of the county’s rural area; they have raised concerns about the availability of power, effects on water quality and the potential that the buildings could quickly become obsolete as technology continues to improve. 

County planners have recommended approval of the proposal, specifically an application to change 2,139 acres in the Comprehensive Plan currently designated as agricultural/estate and environmental resource to technology/flex, parks and open space, county registered historic site and environmental resource overlay.

The proposed change would target 1,321 acres as technology/flex, 807 acres as parks and open space, 439.8 acres as environmental resource protection overlay and 9.6 acres as county historic registered site.

The staff report says if the Comprehensive Plan amendment is approved, the potential data center usage would range from 13.2 million to 27 million square feet and support 1,471 to 5,048 jobs. 

The low end is more in line with rezoning requests filed by Compass Datacenters and QTS Realty Trust Inc. rather than the 27.6 million square feet touted by the proposal’s supporters. The combined Compass and QTS projects cover 1,636 acres and 18.42 million square feet.

Wednesday night's hearing is only for the Comprehensive Plan amendment, not the two rezonings. However, if the Comprehensive Plan update is approved, it will weigh heavily in favor of the rezonings.

____________________

This is an InsideNoVa.com news alert. Check back to InsideNoVa.com for a recap of the Planning Commission's deliberations. 

 

Nolan Stout covers Prince William County. Reach him at nstout@insidenova.com or @TheNolanStout on Facebook and Twitter.

(3) comments

Bill Wright

While the fate of the Prince William Digital Gateway proposal is still undecided, one thing isn’t. That’s the verdict on the atrocious process employed by our county government to “review” it.

Normally a proposal of this unprecedented magnitude would warrant multiple studies, surveys and interactive public forms to ensure all relevant issues were thoroughly assessed and constituent sentiment ascertained. Instead, we got just the opposite.

Professional conscientiousness was absent, critical information was suppressed, prudent precautions denied and resident input stifled. Officials expected to represent the taxpaying public seemed far more protective of private interests.

One thing that is particularly odd is how our government appears to be gauging support for the proposal. Rather than employing valid survey techniques or facilitated public discussions, they seem to give a handful of financially advantaged supporters equal weight with thousands of adversely affected citizens.

Will the outcome of this review turn on a thorough and dispassionate analysis of the facts or the effectiveness of a corporate marketing machine?

Another wholly deficient premise is that this proposal represents the reasonable exercise of property rights.

Landowners who have become disenchanted with their properties have every right to sell under the existing zoning conditions.

But the county has no obligation to alter those conditions simply to accommodate landowners’ grander ambitions, especially when they result in Carthaginian consequences for the citizens remaining.

The combined effect of the above is a profound skepticism about who our government is working for. The upcoming vote will confirm or refute those suspicions.

Lynne June

Using little kids as pawns, who don’t have a clue as to why they’re there. Keep it classy parents.

Duke Nukem

So are the terrorists those against or for the datacenters? Asking for an (D)FBI friend.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.