PW Digital Gateway map

The PW Digital Gateway has seen its first public review by Prince William County officials, but its fate remains murky as some officials keep their opinions close to the chest.

The Planning Commission on Wednesday held a work session on the proposal, the first for the application.

Last summer, landowners along Pageland Lane submitted a request to change the land designation of their properties in the Comprehensive Plan from agricultural zoning to technology zoning for the PW Digital Gateway. 

The Board of Supervisors later expanded the request to cover 2,100 acres, which could pave the way for 27.6 million square feet of data centers, nearly as much data center space as is currently in use or under construction in neighboring Loudoun County, the world’s largest concentration of such facilities.

The project has quickly become the most controversial and contentious local land-use proposal in decades. Opponents and proponents have launched personal attacks against each other, and it has spawned recall efforts against Gainesville Supervisor Pete Candland and Board Chair Ann Wheeler.

Supporters of the PW Digital Gateway say it will provide a huge economic boom to the county in an area that’s no longer rural. Opponents say such large developments would decimate the character of the county’s rural area; they have raised concerns about the availability of power, effects on water quality and the potential the buildings could quickly become obsolete as technology continues to improve.  

Earlier this month, county staff released a plan for regulating the project but stopped short of providing a recommendation. The draft plan calls for stricter regulations than those proposed by developers.

The staff plan calls for a hard limit of 27 million square feet of data centers in the entire area and discourages any other heavy industrial uses. 

County officials have emphasized a need to split certain regulations between the northern end and the southern end, which is near Manassas National Battlefield Park and Conway Robinson State Forest.

Gainesville Commissioner Richard Berry, whose district includes the proposal, said the review “has been a very frustrating process for me, and I know for many constituents.”

The county is moving forward with the digital gateway while simultaneously updating its Comprehensive Plan and reviewing a potential expansion of the Data Center Opportunity Zone Overlay District.

“My preference is that we complete the Comprehensive Plan update first,” Berry said. “I think we are considering these things in a backwards manner.”

Berry had “significant concerns” with allowing development in the southern part of the proposal.

“I do not think that it represents good planning to be planning development in an area where there is cultural, environmental and historic sensitivity, such as the southern section of this plan,” he said. “I personally don’t think it’s a suitable area for development - commercial or residential.”

On the northern end, building height would be limited to 85 feet with limited exceptions. Staff recommends limiting height, with narrow exceptions, to 45 feet in the southern end, with less floor area density.

The developers have proposed 100 feet in the north and 65 feet in the south.

Brentsville Commissioner Tom Gordy said the height restrictions could be ignored, noting that some developers are already returning to the county to get approved for taller buildings.

“The pursuit will be for something higher, and they’ve already demonstrated it even after it’s been approved at a lower height,” he said. “I think the best thing for us to do is avoid that problem.”

The county’s proposed guidelines were based on tests for what could be seen from certain areas of Manassas National Battlefield Park.

“It’s important to preserve those views to the extent that you can, because those views tell you how battles unfolded from the vantage point from which you’re standing,” said county archaeologist Justin Patton. “When you walk out to a battlefield, or a historic site for that matter, you feel like you’re there.”

Neabsco Commissioner Qwendolyn Brown pressed questions about the viewshed impact and implied that existing transmission lines already hurt the views. 

"I’m not sure how there can be anything worse than those,” she said.

Patton said the lines “create a visual impact” but the county is “proposing that we still need to do mitigation strategies to save what we can.”

Throughout the corridor, the plan recommends 150-foot buffers on all sides of the development, although Gordy said the northern portion should have larger buffers to further protect the battlefield viewshed.

The plan says the companies should be encouraged to use minimum water and implement sustainability initiatives. 

At-Large Commissioner Patty Kuntz said runoff would be less from data centers than it is from existing farmland. She also repeated a talking point of supporters who say the facilities would use less water than the Heritage Hunt golf course.

“As of now, farmers can water as much as they want and put as much fertilizer as they want,” she said. “When and if the data centers come in, they will have to work under the laws of the environmental impact … So the runoff should be much less”

Kuntz also questioned if the regulations could “deter” developers from “creating the area they need to actually have a quality working data center.”

Deputy Planning Director Meika Daus said the industry has voiced “concerns about that limitation.”

Many residents have worried about the potential noise impacts from the industry, allthough Berry said, “There are two data centers right next to the Freedom Center at George Mason [University] that I go by every day and I can’t hear anything.”

Berry said the county needs to “make sure we do everything we possibly can to make sure that’s minimized.”

Gordy and Berry requested more information about the potential power needs for the proposal and if it would require additional infrastructure.

County staff will use feedback from the work session to create a second draft plan. Officials will not provide a recommendation until the application goes for a public hearing.

Compass Datacenters and QTS Realty Trust Inc. have filed rezoning requests for the development. Their combined projects cover 1,636 acres and 18.42 million square feet of data centers, substantially less than the 27.6 million square feet touted by the initial application.

The county has not scheduled a public hearing on the Comprehensive Plan amendment or the rezonings.

The Planning Commission did not take any public comment at its Wednesday meeting because it was strictly a work session.

 

Nolan Stout covers Prince William County. Reach him at nstout@insidenova.com or @TheNolanStout on Facebook and Twitter.

(4) comments

Duke Nukem

Aww I feel bad for the privileged suburbanites complaining about a little white noise from a possible next door datacenter. Can't be any worse than the thundering footsteps of the kids of your six neighbors living all around you in your condo thanks to the Biden economy and the lefts dream of everyone living like sardines.

Ed Pa

“There are two data centers right next to the Freedom Center at George Mason [University] that I go by every day and I can’t hear anything.”

Idiotic comment unless you're on foot. The data centers in Haymarket across from Walmart hum with massive amounts of air conditioning except when the noise is drowned out by the diesel generator tests.

Bill Wright

The Planning Office brief on the Prince William Digital Gateway for the Planning Commissioners’ work session on July 20th was a puff piece. It continued the Planning Office pattern of bypassing any serious analysis of risks versus benefits and focusing solely on how to minimize the proposal’s expected negative impacts. It seems to assume approval and then goes about telling how we might keep the lid on the garbage can.

Fortunately, some of the commissioners, notably Rick Berry and Tom Gordy, asked probing questions to reveal the brief’s shortcomings. Commissioner at Large Patty Kuntz provided some comic relief by implausibly suggesting data centers would be more environmentally friendly than the agricultural and residential uses they would replace. She couldn’t resist getting in a dig about golf courses. I eagerly await her next inane observation about the environmental threat posed by bocce and pickleball courts.

The brief contained no slides on the effect on the watershed or recently documented noise issues. There was zero mention of the effect on electrical infrastructure for an obviously power intensive project. Why are such serious issues treated so dismissively? The briefing never even touched on the subject of data center capacity already under development and whether this project is even needed in the first place despite this topic being raised countless times in public forums.

There was absolutely no consideration of the County’s revised Comprehensive Plan and whether the Prince William Digital Gateway even fits into the County’s vision. Commissioner Berry correctly stated said that this vision must precede any consideration of the proposal.

This is a clearly troubled proposal being held aloft solely by supporters’ financial interests.

John Madden

“There are two data centers right next to the Freedom Center at George Mason [University] that I go by every day and I can’t hear anything.”

You won't hear a thing driving by them. Living or walking next to one is another story. It's like living next to a bus terminal with the constant drone of the AC units.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.