Bi-County Parkway presser

Alan Johnson (left) and Philomena Hefter, both residents on Pageland Road in Gainesville, hold a banner that says "Say "No!" to Tri-County Parkway" during a 2013 protest. Behind Johnson is state Senator Dick Black (R-13th). 

The controversial planned Bi-County Parkway was dealt yet another blow this week.

In a surprise move Tuesday, the Prince William County Board of Supervisors voted 4 to 3 to remove the future 10-mile roadway from the county’s long-range planning blueprint, known as the “comprehensive plan.”

The vote was unexpected because the board verbally agreed March 8 to open a public hearing on matter Tuesday but delay their vote until April 5 because Chairman Corey Stewart, R-At Large, said he would be traveling for business and would not be able to attend the March 15 meeting.

But those plans apparently changed when the road’s opponents realized they had the votes needed to extract the Bi-County Parkway from the comprehensive plan.

The vote split mostly along party lines, with Republican Supervisors Ruth Anderson, Occoquan, Maureen Caddigan, Potomac, Pete Candland, Gainesville, and Jeanine Lawson, Brentsville, voting to nix the road, while Supervisor Marty Nohe, R-Coles, joined Democratic Supervisors John Jenkins, Neabsco, and Frank Principi, Woodbridge, in voting against it.

Candland said Thursday several supervisors believed the parkway had been debated long enough and that many believed their voices “would be diminished” if the vote were delayed.

“It was time we addressed it,” Candland said. “The vote was a big win for the citizens of Prince William County who have been held hostage by this poorly designed Bi-County Parkway routing plan.”

Principi said he tried to protest the vote by reminding his fellow supervisors of their public statement March 8 promising to move the vote to their first meeting in April.

But County Attorney Michelle Robl advised that because the board never voted on the delay, the verbal agreement was not binding.

“That is just dirty politics,” Principi said Thursday. “It’s just not good for our community.”

The parkway, which has been on state and local long-range transportation plans since the 1980s, would extend Va. 234 north to U.S. 50 in Loudoun County. The road is planned to be a four-lane, limited-access parkway that would ease trips between Prince William and Loudoun counties and open up another access point to Dulles International Airport.

The road is considered key to accommodate current and future population growth and as well as economic development. For that reason, it is widely supported by business and development groups.

But the road is also planned to skirt the western edge of the protected Manassas National Battlefield Park and is considered a threat to the county’s rural crescent, where residential development is limited to one home per 10 acres. Both are key points of contention for the road’s many opponents.

Caddigan has been a vocal critic of the parkway because residents in neighborhoods along Va. 234, including Montclair and Ashland, fear it would draw heavier truck traffic between Dulles and Interstate 95.

Supervisors were cautioned against removing the parkway from the comprehensive plan, however, by both the Virginia Department of Transportation and their own transportation department, because of the effect to other roads in the county.

According to VDOT projections, the loss of the parkway would exacerbate congestion on nearly every other main north-south artery in the county, including Va. 234, Prince William Parkway, U.S. 15, Sudley Road and Pageland Lane.

VDOT also predicts 20 percent increases in traffic on several secondary roads, including Waterway Drive and Joplin, Spriggs, Delaney and Hoadly roads.

Also, the move could come with a big price tag. VDOT has already purchased right-of-way property along Va. 234 for which it could now ask the county for reimbursement, according to a VDOT staff report.

It is not immediately clear how much the county might have to pay the state, however, since those details were not included in the report.

It also remains unclear what effect the supervisors’ vote will have in the long term, considering the parkway remains on state long-range plans as well as those in Loudoun and Fairfax counties.

Principi said he, too, has “issues” with some aspects of the Bi-County Parkway as planned, but contends that taking it off the county’s transportation blueprint is not the responsible way to deal with those challenges.

“The vote on the Bi-County Parkway was a vote to stop that other conversation,” Principi said. “The system is broken if we don’t build this road.”

You must be logged in to react.
Click any reaction to login.


(5) comments


If we don't build the bi-county parkway through that crappy farm land, how are we ever going to build the townhouses and strip malls we promise not to build along the parkway that will be needed to increase the tax base to support more schools, roadways, police, and of course more town homes? Now answer me that, huh? [sad]

Elena Schlossberg

Corey Stewart had made promises to too many people. The people found out that he was going to vote no on removal of the bi county parkway, in spite of all his public promises. So the dirty politics was Corey. Period.

The Bi County Parkway is to serve one purpose, to bring trucks off of 95 South and redirect them to a more direct route to Dulles. That is EXACTLY what the assistant Secretary of Transportation told the community during a public town hall.

"Dulles is a multi billion dollar economic businessf or the State of Virginia" and this route will increase the efficiency of getting delivery trucks and goods to Dulles.

Anyone who thinks that this is an east west fix is living in another reality. But what it will do is make PWC into the next Jersey Turnpike. No thanks.


NPS has wanted the roads through the battlefield closed. If the residents are fighting this bad; lets see how bad the commute is when NPS shuts down 29 and 234 through the park.

They want that road closed to protect the battlefield. If you dont want a replacement, oops.


Teachers also give besttermseducation and it also gives self-reliance and it also increases the confidence level and it give proper end result and perfect pondering.


When the politicians screw the citizens it's good for the community.
But when the citizens stop the politicians from screwing the people it's called dirty politics.

When it comes to truth this statement is hotter than the surface of the sun: "VDOT has already purchased right-of-way property along Va. 234"

The tip-top of a very large, very ugly iceberg has raised it's head:

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.