Dual-use trail could be coming to another W&OD segment

A concept design for the W&OD Trail that would separate pedestrians from bicyclists. (NOVA Parks)

Arlington County Board members on Nov. 19 voted unanimously to support a request from the Northern Virginia Regional Park Authority (NOVA Parks) seeking $5.65 million in regional funding to improve and expand the Washington & Old Dominion Trail over a two-mile stretch in the western part of the county.

But the support was in general terms only; county leaders said that if the funds are approved by the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA), the project will come back to the County Board for a thorough review of the ultimate design.

Despite criticism from some quarters that the proposal was not yet fully vetted, board members said the time was right to endorse the request for funding.

“It would be just extraordinarily irresponsible not to support this,” board member Erik Gutshall said, with the caveat that some of the objections raised in a public hearing were worth exploring later in the process.

Among those objecting was Arlington Forest resident Rick Epstein, who said endorsement of the funding request put the cart before the horse, since the public has not had a substantive opportunity to weigh in.

“Adoption will bias any public-engagement process,” said Epstein, who suggested other less environmentally invasive options should be explored.

NOVA Parks aims to replace the existing 12-foot-wide, shared-use trail with a 12-foot-wide bicycle trail and an 8-foot wide pedestrian trail – separated by a 2-foot buffer – from North Roosevelt Street near  the Falls Church border east to North Carlin Springs Road. The project also would include stormwater-management improvements and widening of several trail bridges.

Approval by the County Board is needed so the project can move onto the agenda of NVTA, which will score it based on the amount of congestion relief it could provide for the Interstate 66 corridor. NVTA already has funded expansion of the trail in the Falls Church area, but funding for the Arlington segment will depend on how the project’s congestion-mitigation effects are calculated.

County Board member Katie Cristol said the board’s action to seek the funding does not imply endorsement of any final design. But, she added, the goal of the project was the right one.

“Getting more cars off of I-66 is in all of our best interests,” Cristol said.

Among those supporting the proposal was Katie Harris, representing the Capital Trails Coalition.

“We should see this as a massive opportunity,” she told board members. “Trails enhance communities; the better the trails are, the healthier our community will be.”

If funding is procured, engineering for the Arlington stretch could begin in 2021 and construction would follow a year or two later.

The stretch of the trail proposed to be widened passes close by the East Falls Church Metro station and provides connections to the Custis Trail and Bluemont Junction Trail; the improvements would provide a better experience for pedestrians and bicyclists headed to and from Ballston, Clarendon, Courthouse and Rosslyn and a number of local parks.

Response to the proposal was “overwhelmingly positive” in an online survey conducted by NOVA Parks, said Paul Gilbert, the agency’s executive director. Nearly 80 percent of the 900-plus respondents said they found current conditions of the trail in Arlington to be congested, and more than 94 percent said separating bicyclists from pedestrians is a good idea.

But critics of the proposal also zeroed in on why the measure had been placed on the County Board’s Nov. 16 “consent agenda,” a place for items where no opposition is anticipated. The measure was pulled off for a full vetting at the Nov. 19 meeting.

In remarks at the meeting, Cristol intimated that putting items like this one on the consent agenda – a joint responsibility of staff and the County Board chairman – needed to be thought through carefully in the future. But that alone was not enough to cause a delay in approval, she suggested.

Gilbert said the Falls Church section of the project, which is expected to be built next year, provides a road map for how his agency is proceeding, particularly on the stormwater-management front.

“We are installing swales to capture and slow the water. We have meadow sections, and in places we are using modular wetlands, which is a cool new technology that filters the water with a largely underground system,” he said.

The W&OD Regional Trail runs for 45 miles from Shirlington west into Loudoun County, occupying the roadbed used from the 1850s to the mid-1960s by the Washington & Old Dominion Railroad and its predecessors.

(2) comments

Allen Muchnick

IMO, this proposed project seems a *very* low priority. It would further degrade a flood-prone stream valley park with more unnecessary pavement while providing zero new useful pedestrian and bicycling access and likely worsening—more than improving—the enjoyment, comfort, and safety of walkers, joggers, casual bicyclists, and other park visitors.

Twin parallel paved trails already exist along this segment, the “W&OD Trail” itself (technically the I-66/Custis Trail between the Brandymore Castle hill and Bon Air Park) and Arlington’s Four Mile Run Trail. Rebuilding the Four Mile Run Trail with a softer, permeable surface for pedestrians and casual bike riders and perhaps slightly widening the W&OD Trail’s soft shoulders could provide better trails at far lower cost.

The best use of this money would be to make these trails and the adjacent Four Mile Run more flood resilient. Also, this entire trail segment should have streetlights--and the awful, obsolete streetlights along the I-66 segment are overdue for replacement--the NOVA Parks' proposal would not improve any of the streetlights.

With the proliferation of electric-assist bicycles, speeding and inconsiderate passing on the W&OD Trail will only increase, and a wider paved width will only worsen these problems. If the design shown in the top illustration is built, some inconsiderate speeding bike rides would overtake by using the pedestrian path on the left.

I agree, however, that the objections to this project based on tree loss are largely unfounded. Because the trail is beneath Dominion’s electric transmission lines, there are very few trees close to this trail.

Sadly, once again, Arlington County’s bike/ped program is doing little or nothing to advance creating new bike/ped access across major travel barriers (e.g., crossing the GWMP at Long Bridge Park, building the Hoffman-Boston/ANCC connector [emergency access road] between Columbia Pike and Pentagon City, building an underpass for the Custis Trail at N. Lynn St at Rosslyn Circle, improved access to the Roosevelt, Memorial, and Mason Bridges across the Potomac) and is deferring to NOVA Parks’ misguided and destructive ambitions to overpave its parks.

CJE

What has to occur right now is a public safety presence on all trails. Who will enforce the trail's speed limit? No one. Looking at the above photo there is no concern whatsoever about collisions, especially head-on collisions. There isn't even a mandatory bicycle helmet law for adults in Virginia. Another special interest demand, another gimme by the County Board. Consequences? What are "consequences"?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.