An inside-the-Beltway jurisdiction is working to get its hands on cash designated to ease congestion outside the Beltway. But for the Arlington officials who are proposing it, there is a method to the seeming madness.

Arlington County Board members have authorized their staff to seek nearly $30 million in funds from the Northern Virginia Transportation Authority (NVTA), a pool of cash designed to ease congestion for commuters and others living along the route of the Interstate 66 from the Beltway to points west.

The request seeks a portion of the $500 million available to government agencies, part of the agreements between the Virginia Department of Transportation and a private firm to add and operate toll lanes on the portion of the highway outside the Beltway. (Toll lanes also are coming inside the Beltway, but will be operated by the state government.)

Arlington’s request seeks improvements to the East Falls Church Metro station, with the lion’s share – $23 million – to provide design and engineering of a second entrance to the station from Washington Boulevard. The overall project cost is estimated at $96 million.

County officials also are seeking an estimated $6 million for the addition of two bus bays in the current bus loop at the station, along with miscellaneous upgrades to shelters and pedestrian access.

How do the updates jibe with the stated goal of improving the lives of those outside the Beltway? In a letter to NVTA’s executive director, County Board Chairman Jay Fisette said the projects demonstrate “a clear and compelling nexus” to help transit riders from points west (whether by bus or Metro’s Orange and Silver lines) get east.

June 28 was the deadline for localities to formally request funds from the $500 million pool. The Northern Virginia Transportation Authority is expected to forward its list of recommended projects to the Commonwealth Transportation Board by October.

(2) comments


More lipstick on a pig. Metrorail is an obsolete 2-track system, where trains stop at every station, which was designed 50 years ago to serve a medium-density city and low density suburbs. Something else people who live nowhere near Metrorail are expected to pay for with increased taxes, fees, and tolls.


JM, Please share your examples of non-obsolete systems designed less than 50 years ago that have more than 2 tracks! The only major systems in USA with four tracks are New York City (only some lines have 4 tracks, e.g. L train is 2 tracks), Chicago (only a few lines have more than 2 tracks), and Philadelphia (only a portion of one line has more than 2 tracks). And all of those systems with more than 2 tracks were constructed far more than 50 years ago.

If you feel that Metro should be reconstructed to have 4 tracks on all lines, note that you will need far more than $500 Million; such an effort would be in the order of tens of BILLIONS. A better idea is to optimize and improve the current system, which is one of the newer major subways in the entire country, and hardly "obsolete."

The big issue here is that Arlington is trying to get its hands on money from OUTSIDE the BELTWAY, not just the INSIDE the BELTWAY share. Folks outside the beltway are paying for that money with their homes taken away, their transit oriented communities destroyed to pour more concrete, the rare green areas near the existing I-66 destroyed, while paying high tolls to a contractor for 50+ years. And if you want to use the existing lanes? Tough, because one of those (the green arrow lane) is disappearing.

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.