With their majority running out of days on the calendar, Republican leaders of the Prince William Board of County Supervisors are considering a resolution proclaiming the county a so-called Second Amendment sanctuary.

On Tuesday, more than 30 people asked the supervisors to follow the example of other more rural Virginia counties in response to Democrats taking control of the state’s legislature after November victories — wins at least partially attributed to support for gun law reforms.

The new year will also usher in new Democratic leadership in Prince William — the county’s board will go from a 6-2 Republican majority to a 5-3 Democratic majority when new members take the oath in early January.

Many of the sanctuary resolution supporters Tuesday night wore bright orange stickers that said “Guns save lives.” 

The Second Amendment states, “A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.” It has been the basis of many challenges to gun law reforms on the state and national level.

One person Tuesday spoke against the proposed resolution, while more than 30 people discussed how gun rights were enshrined in the state‘s and country’s Constitutions and how they own guns to protect themselves. 

One resolution supporter asked the board to send a message to Richmond that they can’t infringe on the rights of residents.

The terms for the current board of county supervisors continue until Dec. 31, giving the GOP-led board just enough time to consider any proposed resolution on the matter.

At-large Chair Corey Stewart said a board supervisor could propose the resolution at the Dec. 3 meeting and the board could consider voting on it at its Dec. 10 meeting. 

Stewart told InsideNoVa on Wednesday he thinks the proposed resolution is a good idea, but it would have to be written properly. 

“Unfortunately, in pre-file legislation in the General Assembly, there’s a number of bills that would curb Second Amendment rights in Virginia and obviously people are really concerned about that,” Stewart said. “I was surprised at the level of very vocal concerns that were expressed in Prince William here in Northern Virginia last night and obviously that these Second Amendment sanctuary resolutions have been popping up all over the state.” 

Stewart said a proposed resolution could say that the county will not use law enforcement resources to enforce a state law that is passed after Jan. 1 that restricts gun rights. 

Stewart said he’s aware that even if the board can pass the resolution in December, the new board of county supervisors, whose terms start in January, could overturn the resolution. 

“People care a lot about this,” he said. “This is a lightning rod issue, anytime you’re dealing with gun rights, that gets people going on both sides.”

Supervisor Pete Candland, R-Gainesville, asked the county’s attorney to look at implications and effects if the board adopts the proposed resolution to make the county a Second Amendment sanctuary county. 

Stewart asked Michelle Robl, county attorney, to complete a report by Dec. 3, but no later than a few days before the Dec. 10 meeting. 

At the Tuesday meeting, Lawson said she will read emails and template resolution and Candland said he's trying to digest the proposed resolution. 

Rappahannock County’s board will weigh a similar request for a sanctuary resolution at its meeting Dec. 2, reports John McCaslin at the Rappahannock News.

That resolution in part reads:

“WHEREAS, the Rappahannock County Board of Supervisors is concerned about about the passage of any bill containing language which could be interpreted as infringing the rights of the citizens of Rappahannock County to keep and bear arms… [the resolution would] direct the law enforcement and employees of Rappahannock County to not enforce any unconstitutional law.”

Such a resolution, if approved, is not legally binding, but an expression of public stance as interpreted by elected representatives, McCaslin noted.

Similar resolutions have passed recently in Pittsylvania, Campbell, Appomattox, Charlotte, Carroll, Dinwiddie, Dickenson, Lee, Nottoway, Patrick, and Giles counties in Virginia.

(10) comments

OBLUE

this reporter said more than 30 people showed up in support the other paper said 70 jeez i wonder who was really at the meeting

tman

Is this designed to address Red Flag laws? I'm all for a judge temporarily removing firearms from a dangerous situation, given sufficient evidence.

AJH

I’m all for due process.

insidebugging

Meh, symbolic gesture and lame political theater. The new liberal board will just shoot it down on their first day in office. The current GOP RINOs on the board were a total embarrassment and accomplished nothing of value except take small bribes from developers so they could build never ending sprawl up and down the county.

icrazyhorse

Corey's parting show to PWC - a hard kick between the legs. I am glad this bozo is leaving office.

MEIavecchia

Douchebag #LiarsLeakersAndLiberals in Virginia @vahouse and @vasenate are trying to take our guns. Over my dead body @insidenova

larryclyons

Another Ammosexual. If you need to spray and pray when you're hunting, you need another hobby.

As for that bravado about over your dead body, so brave, but in reality you'd be running away and screaming like a frightened school girl.

AJH

The US Bill of Rights 2nd Amendment enumerates the right to keep and bear arms and Art 1 Section 13 of the Va Constitution says about the same.

Citizens have a right of self-protection and to have a gun.

Neither Congress nor the General Assembly have the ability to take this right away, they neither created the right nor granted it. As our Declaration of Independence clearly states, rights are unalienable and come from nature or nature’s God. The federal Bill of Rights Grants no rights, it enumerates them as does the Va Constitution. Government can establish regulations, but it cannot take them away, abolish them nor ban them.

larryclyons

What many supporters of this sort of bill forget is that the entire amendment refers to the right of the state to protect itself with a well regulated militia. That phrase well regulated militia has very specific meanings according to George Washington. From Washington’s very first State of the Union on January 8, 1790.

“A free people ought not only to be armed, but disciplined; to which end a uniform and well-digested plan is requisite; and their safety and interest require that they should promote such manufactories as tend to render them independent of others for essential, particularly military, supplies.”

Washington was speaking on the need for states to ensure that their militia (these days the National Guard) were well trained and supplied. A trained and well supplied state militia were essential to the security of the United States because the founders did not want a large Federal army.

DebLegg

Ever heard of Heller?

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
PLEASE TURN OFF YOUR CAPS LOCK.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.