Copy of Page 22 Opinion Jennifer Wall.jpg

Jennifer Wall

Few issues have polarized our community in recent years as much as Prince William County’s proposed seismic shift in land-use policy, particularly around data center development – a shift that will fundamentally change the county.

In that regard, the number of data centers that have come to the public’s attention in recent weeks has been breathtaking.

I support the efforts of the county to diversify its tax base and appreciate that a diversified tax base will provide more funding to our schools and much-needed tax relief to Prince William residents. In fact, I support building data centers in Prince William.

But whether to build data centers is not the question. The real question is where.

As a member of the Prince William School Board, I have been contacted by many people expressing concern about the explosion of data centers near schools, neighborhoods and open space. The concerns brought to me are not political. The concerns are inherently practical, and many residents believe that the concerns they have voiced to their elected county leaders have gone unheard.

I am concerned that our community is under-informed about where the county has approved data centers, especially the prospect of 110-foot tall data centers a mere 50 feet from our schools. The concern is especially acute with respect to planned data center development near Tyler Elementary, PACE West, Piney Branch Elementary, Chris Yung Elementary, Ellis Elementary and Unity Reed and Gainesville high schools and in those schools’ surrounding neighborhoods.

I question the rush to broaden the county’s Data Center Opportunity Zone Overlay District. County leadership have provided no explanation for the expedited nature of this push, other than that the county desperately wants the additional tax revenue.

If the concern is about filling county coffers, then before expanding data center zones the county should (1) build out the original overlay district and (2) double the data center tax rate, resulting in a rate that would still be 20% less than the Loudoun County rate while preserving existing greenspace surrounding our schools and neighborhoods.

Again, the issue is not whether to build the data centers, but where. In the mad scramble that has been the data center gold rush over the past year, I fear that our county leadership has not considered the potential impact these data centers may have on students and schools, especially those closest to the proposed data centers.

I urge the Board of County Supervisors to take a breath and delay rezoning and site-plan approvals until a full evaluation and assessment of the short-term and long-term impacts of data center development can be made.

Jennifer Wall represents the Gainesville District on the Prince William County School Board.

(3) comments

Wayne D.

Data Centers or thousands more homes that all look the same and the traffic that goes with it. Choose your poison.

Bill Wright

I fully agree with Ms. Wall’s opinion piece.

I’ve seen so many bogus interpretations of property rights. Landowners who have become disenchanted with their properties have every right to sell under the existing zoning conditions. But the county has no obligation to alter those conditions simply to accommodate landowners’ grander ambitions, especially when they result in Carthaginian consequences for the citizens remaining.

I cannot unilaterally decide to turn my property into an open pit coal mine. I must request a rezoning from the county, which my affected neighbors would be invited to weigh in on. If landowners could do whatever they wanted with their property, there would be no rezoning process.

I’m also not sure where the notion came from that houses are more offensive than data centers. The county has a documented housing shortage and I don’t see how this is being addressed by building more data centers instead. Does anybody live in them?

The main point is that however our county developed, it must be done in an intelligent and sustainable way and with due consideration for compatible use of the land. Runaway and willy-nilly data center development certainly isn’t it.

Joe Normandy

i fully support the Pageland Gateway project. i have lived in the area for nearly 25 years and calling us rural is simply comical and i do not own land on Pageland.

It maddening that people want to dictate to others what to do with their land even though the land they now live on was a farm that got plowed under and paved over...guess its ok for them...NIMBY.

The Pageland plan calls for nearly a 50 50 split between land to be used and land to be left green, seems fair.

But if this gets turned down, you know houses, thousands of houses will spring up. More wells, more septic, more in ground fuel tanks, much mych more traffic, more schools, strip malls, police and all paid by more taxes.

While i support caution of build outs around schools there are no schools on Pageland.

So in the end we have Commandos demanding msndates on how a homeowner lives...that is simply wrong

Vote yes on the Pageland buildout, take the tax mobey rather then see another increase and build thoughtfully around the battlefield

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.